User talk:Latinguy2009

Speedy deletion nomination of OFA Little League


A tag has been placed on OFA Little League requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. &mdash; Timneu22 &middot; &#32; talk 00:55, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Re, your message to My76Strat
 Chzz  ► 00:07, 27 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Note, "blog.com" is not a reliable source.  Chzz  ► 11:02, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

More tips;

...ways of running local governments. Some have called on the private sector to assume responsibility...
 * Don't put headings in bold/italics; instead, use  and.
 * Add links to other articles - they're called "Wikilinks" - for example, you could put,
 * ...which will display as,

...ways of running local governments. Some have called on the private sector to assume responsibility...


 * A very useful link for this is WP:CHEATSHEET.


 * Be very careful to remain neutral, not introduce your own ideas, and avoid "peacock terms" and "weasel words". For example,

With social services, there are special reasons to be wary. How society's most vulnerable children and adults are treated reflects our core commitments, and with values such as these at stake, it makes no sense to subordinate public goals to the profit motive.

And this part is an example of original research/opinion: The last thing any community leader, city councilmen or women, or city manager wants to see is an uneducated community. Noone wants to see residents stand up at city council meeting complaining aboout the lack of publication of an event such as the sale of community assets without the public knowing.

My main concern is, you're mistaking Wikipedia for a provider of novel information; it isn't. We only document what other people have already written about. We present facts based on reliable sources, in a totally neutral manner, and let the reader decide which are important and how to interpret the information.

I think it will help if you look at some other, decent quality articles on similar topic areas; try, perhaps, Accounting ethics, or Charitable trusts in English law. I know they're not quite about the same thing, but they might give ideas. To find more, see WP:FA and WP:GA.

Best advice, really, is to edit some other articles - anything; it doesn't matter what. If you dive in and edit other, current articles you'll get more familiar with the way Wikipedia works.

And of course, there's always plenty of help available. Best,  Chzz  ► 13:11, 3 May 2011 (UTC)