User talk:Latinxchicanxart

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adriana Corral has been accepted
 Adriana Corral, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Adriana_Corral help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Bkissin (talk) 18:28, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Ways to improve Esteban Ramón Pérez
Hello, Latinxchicanxart,

Thank you for creating Esteban Ramón Pérez.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"The article can be improved by removing the excessive amount of detail in the Education Sub-section and its Sub-sub sections is unnecessary and is not relevant to an encyclopedia entry. Noting where he received his degrees is enough. That level of detail is more appropriate for the artist's personal website. The same is true for the overly detailed sub-sub sections on his various shows. This is an emerging artist in the beginning stages of his career. Much of this content belongs on his own website. It's not relevant to tell WP editors details about the gallerists, nor the artists who displayed work next to his. What is most important is basic biographic information, and showing why he may be notable - what relaiable sources that are independent of the artist - have said about him, for example reviews in art magazines, academic journals or books. Too many of the sources hare directly connected to him. I know this is a lot of information to take in. You are welcome to ping me if you have any questions."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Netherzone (talk) 00:05, 11 October 2022 (UTC)