User talk:Lato Paper

 Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must: To do this, post the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
 * Provide a new username.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Alexf(talk) 22:35, 26 May 2024 (UTC)


 * This is ridiculous.
 * First of all, the account name is the name of the publishing company that publishes Mike Brodie, so what? A reason that reinforces the veracity of the information we have included, since we are the only entity to publish Mike Brodie after a long time.
 * Second, Mike Brodie's profile is incomplete and missing publications that you removed due to my error (link pointing to the book) A way to prove the veracity of the information entered, since these are publications outside the mainstream, certainly not to sell, since it is sold out. All this goes against objective information, as you have deleted a vital entry, as it proved the activity of an internationally recognized photographer returning to publishing. So much so that I also published an interview. For a mistake in good faith you deleted and blocked the account"? Just edit the link. The whole thing is pathetic. It will mean that I will have other accounts edit the information. No problem. Lato Paper (talk) 22:53, 26 May 2024 (UTC)