User talk:LauraJMogil

Your submission at Articles for creation: Creighton Michael (February 22)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Creighton Michael and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Creighton_Michael Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:S0091&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Creighton_Michael reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 17:47, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Creighton Michael (February 24)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Creighton Michael and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Creighton_Michael Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Chetsford&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Creighton_Michael reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chetsford (talk) 09:08, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Creighton Michael has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Creighton Michael. Thanks! S0091 (talk) 19:32, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Creighton Michael has been accepted
 Creighton Michael, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Creighton_Michael help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! S0091 (talk) 17:15, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, LauraJMogil. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Creighton Michael, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the edit COI template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see );
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see );
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. ''I know you are trying to address some of the issues but if you are affiliated with Michael, you do need to declare a conflict of interest on your User page (User:LauraJMogil). If you are his employee or he is your client, then you need make WP:PAID declaration. At this point, you should not be editing the article directly but instead making edit requests as outlined above. If you have questions or need help, you can ask the Teahouse. (Side note - I disagree with the tag stating he might not meet notability but the purpose of tags is draw attention to other experienced editors so one might come along in the next month or so and brush it up).'' S0091 (talk) 19:22, 27 February 2024 (UTC)


 * This is not the case.
 * Laura Mogil LauraJMogil (talk) 19:27, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Then I think you have some explaining to do, such as the photo of him which you claim is your own work, meaning you took it. Which also means you know him well enough to take a photo of him.  Please also be mindful, as stated above, undisclosed paid editing is in violation of Wikipedia's Terms of Use and a blockable offense.  Best to be transparent.   S0091 (talk) 19:34, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I did not take the photo of him. It does not indicate that anywhere. LauraJMogil (talk) 19:36, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
 * in fact, some Wikipedia editor removed the photo credit. LauraJMogil (talk) 19:37, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
 * You uploaded the photo and stated you are the author and that it's your work on Commons (Source: Own work, Author:LauraJMogil). If you are now stating it is not, then should be deleted.  S0091 (talk) 19:40, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I added a photo credit in original:
 * Photo credit: Janice Herbert
 * Is it possible to fix this error of mine on your side as this is my first project I’m doing it because I think the artist deserves recognition but am not an expert at all on entering information and would appreciate any assistance you can provide. Thank you.
 * Laura LauraJMogil (talk) 19:45, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
 * The copyright holder, I am assuming in this instance Herbert, has to release the photo under a suitable copyright license. For Commons that means CC-BY-SA, meaning anyone can use it for any purpose (including commercial) as long as they include attribution.  For now, I am going request it be deleted based on this discussion but if you able to prove it meets has suitable copyright, you can re-upload it with the appropriate information or Herbert can upload it.  S0091 (talk) 19:51, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
 * She is allowing the photo to be used. Should I enter her name in commons? LauraJMogil (talk) 19:54, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
 * No, you have prove she has released it under a suitable license. See their FAQ and you get help at their help desk.  Commons is a separate project from the English Wikipedia so I can't offer much more than that.  S0091 (talk) 19:59, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Photo emailed to me with permission to use. LauraJMogil (talk) 19:58, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Can I substitute another photo? LauraJMogil (talk) 20:01, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
 * If you own the copyright and release it under CC-BY-SA, then yes. Also, I will give you one more opportunity be transparent about your affiliation with Michael because you is clear you do have an affiliation.  S0091 (talk) 20:08, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I have written an article on him. Does that need to be disclosed. LauraJMogil (talk) 20:16, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I am away for three weeks. Can you please just take the copyright thing off until I can fix. LauraJMogil (talk) 20:07, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I don’t know what you mean. I know him and admire his work. Is that what is meant. There is no exchange of money, just an admiration of his work. LauraJMogil (talk) 20:13, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
 * If anyone contacts you about paying them, ignore them and see WP:SCAM. S0091 (talk) 20:20, 27 February 2024 (UTC)