User talk:Lauramparsons

October 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. KCinDC (talk) 00:14, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Ted Sundquist constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. ~Pip 01:31, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

October 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ted Sundquist, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ted Sundquist was changed by Lauramparsons (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2009-10-26T19:54:14+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:54, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Please don't remove tags from wikipedia articles, as you did with Ted Sundquist. The tags are there to alert other editors to problems within the article. If you don't fix the problems, the tags should not be removed. Raven1977 Talk to me My edits 19:01, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Ted Sundquist
Please explain the reasons for your revert at the article talk page. This article is also being discussed at Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard. Sergeant Cribb (talk) 19:43, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ted Sundquist, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Yworo (talk) 19:51, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

June 2011
Hello Lauramparsons. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Ted Sundquist, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:59, 3 June 2011 (UTC)