User talk:Laurawgenesyn

File:GD2Back.jpg‎‎ and File:GD2Front.jpg
Hi.

If you don't believe File:GD2Back.jpg‎‎ and File:GD2Front.jpg are respectively screenshots of software on Windows and OS X, please cite a source. Otherwise, their uncanny resemblance warrants their presence in their corresponding category.

Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 23:23, 16 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi, thanks for the feedback. I was under the impression that you were saying GeneDesigner was Windows Software (i.e. created by Microsoft and part of the Windows suite), not other software that happens to be open on a computer running a Windows operating system. The page that you linked the image to is titled "Category:Screenshots of Windows software". The majority of examples on this page are in fact windows software: the various software and accessories designed and produced by Microsoft that come pre-loaded on your Windows enabled computer. Ditto for the "Category:Screenshots of OS X software" link and page.  It is unclear whether these pages should include any software open on a computer running these operating systems or whether the pages are for software specifically developed and released as part of those operating systems.  If it is the latter, the pages should probably be renamed. If the former, then these screenshots do not warrant inclusion on the Windows or OS X pages.  As Gene Designer is neither Windows nor Apple software, I did not believe them to belong to either category.
 * Would very much appreciate further clarification.
 * Regards, Laurawgenesyn (talk) 16:27, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi. You are right about components of operating systems. I am moving them into subcategories of Category:Screenshots of Microsoft Windows, e.g. Category:Screenshots of Windows 8 . But they are a lot. I am not done yet. As for screenshots of OS X components, I'll see what happens when I am done with Windows.


 * Here is a rule of thumb: "Windows component" means a program that comes with Windows. "Windows software" means the entire set of computer programs that are developed so that they run on Windows. They might or might not belong to Microsoft. (Compare Microsoft Office with VLC media player.)


 * Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 17:12, 17 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks so much Codename Lisa for the clarification and helping to sort out the pages. Definitely a different subset.  Good luck with your work in moving and tagging all the images.


 * Regards, Laurawgenesyn (talk) 17:27, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:DNA2.0 logo 2012 alpha.png
Thank you for uploading File:DNA2.0 logo 2012 alpha.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:DNA2.0 logo 2012 alpha.png
Thanks for uploading File:DNA2.0 logo 2012 alpha.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 28 November 2018 (UTC)