User talk:Laurelpeter122

Merge proposal
I totally suscribe your opinion in here diff. I am aware you are not very active but maybe you can help me merge the contents of this article into others. Triplecaña (talk) 21:35, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Burger King has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:34, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Burger King was changed by Laurelpeter122 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957828 on 2017-04-14T00:34:26+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Burger King, you may be blocked from editing. Neil N  talk to me 00:37, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Hey Laurel. You've been a productive editor. Why the vandalism? --Neil N  talk to me 00:38, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Whopper
I would like to know why you, a fellow New Yorker and constructive editor for over two years, all of a sudden decided to deface Whopper and Burger King in light of national attention? Please reassure me that this account has not been compromised &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  06:27, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Archimedes' screw. Deli nk (talk) 18:48, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of George H. Wells (architect)


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on George H. Wells (architect) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Largoplazo (talk) 18:52, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Widr (talk) 19:00, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I've extended this block to indefinite until you explain your recent vandalism. Widr (talk) 19:30, 17 April 2017 (UTC)