User talk:Lauren.e.davis/sandbox

1) What have you done to revise/add on to your Wikipedia article? If there's anything you still have left to do, what is it? I added a new paragraph, focused on the founding of the Sylvia Rivera project. I'm also going to move one of the citations right after the quote once I get to the actual article. I'm planning on adding in the side deal organizations have on Wikipedia, including things like the logo, founding date, headquarters, etc.

2) What's going well? What are you most proud of so far? I'm honestly proud of the information I found. The story of how the project was formed took a considerable amount of digging to find.

3) What specific places in the article do you want feedback on from your peers? Do you think there is anything else I could add to this article? It's short, even with my addition.

Gabe's Peer Review
Lauren- I LOVE this subject, and I'm so happy you chose something that Wikapedia should have more to offer about. There is not as much information on the project as I would hope, and I would consider adding a biography or link to a biography of Sylvia Rivera. Other than that, things are in great shape. Keep up the wonderful work! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gabewallace (talk • contribs) 16:12, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

McKenzie's Peer Review
Hey Lauren, The article originally contained information and you were able to more accurately provide the same information without copyright or potential plagiarism. It seemed as if the article did not need much, but your addition of another source aided the flow of information and helped your newfound section. Also, the addition of the founding was very useful in giving more background on the organization. My question is: Are you going to add these in the article that already exists? Or are you going to take out some of the other sections that were made to add yours? i.e. The leading source. I also suggest you add a graphic with publication information about the organization, such as the logo and founding date and other information that pertains too. Overall, your contribution seems very well organized, but you may want to look back into some of your reference sources. Also, see if you can add any more information to the sections already made by the previous authors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mckvnz (talk • contribs) 18:01, 18 April 2018 (UTC)