User talk:Lauren55

December 2015
Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Deepak Chopra, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 21:40, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Deepak Chopra. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 07:14, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Alexbrn (talk) 11:32, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Please don't make big changes to articles without reference to the talk pages!
Hi User:Lauren55, I notice you have been making (and re-making) changes to our article about Deepak Chopra. You may be unaware that repeatedly trying to force an edit is called "Edit Warring" and is considered to be disruptive behavior. I'd suggest that you engage with the discussion at Talk:Deepak Chopra before making any further radical changes. Usually bad behavior on Wikipedia causes more attention from other editors (people such as myself), which means that you are less likely to get your way in an edit war. I can see that another editor has already raised concerns about your behavior - the best way to deescalate this problem is to abide by the community's rules. --Salimfadhley (talk) 19:47, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Zppix. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. GABHello! 20:38, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions notice - Alternative medicine
slakr \ talk / 02:53, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

No idea
Hello I'm not sure who the hell I am writing to. I would be happy if an administrator too over. And I'm not so sad about being blocked for standing up for justice and what's right. I can go to the wika page of a transvestite and it has less criticism! What's happening on deepak chopras page is a disgrace to wikipedia!!! You have allows his page to become the site of debate. It is no longer about the man nots become an entity unto itself. Go and have a look at it and tell me what u think. Literally the world or writing articles about what a travesty of justice this page is. So block me! What a joke. Wikipedia is not that important-it's just new and there are many more information sites right in your tail. So maybe just maybe have a look at what's going on around there and with all due respect- sort it out!!! All the best, Lauren. Lauren55 (talk) 19:53, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
 * You are not blocked (or you would not be able to leave messages on other user's pages as you have done). The page has been protected for one week, and as a result you cannot edit it. Meters (talk) 20:28, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Zppix. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Meters (talk) 23:28, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Deepak Chopra
Well referenced criticism of a person should be part of an article. The stuff you tried to have deleted is not "gossip". Wikipedia has its many faults but deleting info that you do not like does not help. 203.109.162.133 (talk) 02:50, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Supercell121 (talk) 19:19, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Wiki wars
Hi people of Wikipedia. Your website has become corrupt. This isn't spam or some meaningless voice. This is the truth. Mths integrity of this site has been seriously compromised. The editors we have set up at wiki are- for the main part entirely FUCKING the system. Biased defamatory rude war like bullshit is being allowed to propagate. What's going to happen is one of two things; either you employ editors who have families and educated opinions who actually have strong intelligence and a firm underatanding of THE SERVICE THEY ARE PROVIDING- yes that's right a SERVICE TO THE COMMINITY. the second scenario is that Wikipedia slowly dies as a site- due to that lack of truth and integrity. What's happening right now is that Wikipedia editors have seriously underestimated the intelligence of their audience. I know there are still some great editors there who r struggling with this culture of wAr and ignorance and to you guys. WE WILL PREVAIL.

http://sciencesetfree.tumblr.com/post/63184238054/wikipedia-under-threat Lauren55 (talk) 20:45, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Not seeing a huge conspiracy here, just you edit warring to remove well-sourced material, ignoring multiple request to discuss the edits, and instead attacking other editors. Meters (talk) 21:15, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 23:13, 18 January 2016 (UTC)