User talk:Laurenby95

Your submission at Articles for creation: Courtney E Martin (March 16)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Laurenby95/sandbox/Courtney E Martin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Laurenby95 Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Onel5969&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Laurenby95 reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 17:04, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Courtney E Martin has been accepted
 Courtney E Martin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! --L235 (t / c / ping in reply ) 03:37, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Laurenby95 help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.
 * Hi Laurenby95, I recently accepted this submission. It's been pointed out to me that that accept was a bad judgement on my part, because none of the references sufficiently demonstrate notability. Would you be fine with me moving that page back into draft space so you can keep working on it? (Otherwise, someone else will probably find it and nominate it for deletion.) Sorry about the experience. (if I don't get an objection in the next 24 hours ish, I'm going to assume I have your permission.) --L235 (t / c / ping in reply ) 21:56, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Courtney E Martin


The article Courtney E Martin has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Every source here is a primary source - including the New York Times article, which is just an excerpt of a conversation between Martin and another feminist. Therefore, the article's subject does not seem to be notable per WP:GNG, as the subject has not been covered directly and in detail by reliable secondary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 00:18, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Courtney E Martin for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Courtney E Martin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Courtney E Martin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 14:10, 24 March 2015 (UTC)