User talk:Laurenlouiselawson

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! Regancy42 (talk) 01:13, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Lauren Lawson
A tag has been placed on Lauren Lawson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Regancy42 (talk) 01:13, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Exhall Grange School
Re your edit here. Is the school closing in 2012 or something? If so then you need to provide a reference to support that. Thanks TheRetroGuy (talk) 18:20, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Same for this which is a bit controversial. I Googled it without success and it is something that would be reported in the local press. TheRetroGuy (talk) 17:52, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

August 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page List of Hollyoaks characters has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tommy! [ message ] 23:57, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Exhall Grange School. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tommy! [ message ] 00:01, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to List of minor Coronation Street characters (2010). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Tommy! [ message ] 00:08, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

September 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Loretta Jones has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. The edit in question it chosing to add Bryan Kirkwood as Loretta's creator, when infact it was Lucy Allan and there are multiple sources placed on the page stating this. You keep editing Hollyoaks articles anyway, a lot of the time the edits are reverted.. just make sure you add sources in future, or are 100 percent sure what your adding is atleast right because it's becoming disuptive now.

Do you actually know how to use wikipedia? Why reply to me on your user page, adressing to the whole wikipedia in general. You'll need a reference for your claim, until then it will be reverted, any further changes of the blatant same nature, I'll request a block on your lengthy reign of terror to Hollyoaks related articles. FYI Lucy Allan introduced her back in one of BK's episodes... they were working together.. it would just fool readers if you dress in up as Bryan's bright idea to bring her back. My source, mostly, any single on of the 30 so refs provided... RAIN..the..ONE  HOTLINE 14:22, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

November 2010
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at List of Hollyoaks characters, you may be blocked from editing. ''Removing Logan Fairhurst when he has appeared in Hollyoaks episode, more so this is a regular character that has been IRL filming with the series for four months now. Do not remove again, only remove thing or change things if you've seen a source.''  RAIN..the..ONE  HOTLINE 18:03, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lauren Maxted


A tag has been placed on Lauren Maxted requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ... disco spinster   talk  01:12, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Hollyoaks characters, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''You've removed characters again, actually check the facts first. You'll be reported next time.''  RAIN..the..ONE  HOTLINE 16:37, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

December 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from List of minor Hollyoaks characters (2010). When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. LostHavoc (talk)  22:01, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to List of minor Hollyoaks characters (2010) constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you.  WAYNE  SLAM  22:01, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

No need for the rude comment now is there? To be fair aswell, that's the same twitter account that he was tweeting he was filming with Porter just last month... He's also on the 2010 calender. Maybe if you replied to comments left here and actually talked and helped to contribute cnstructivley, these issues would be avoided. I am aware now scenes have been refilmed with Warren, plans have changed at Hollyoaks. RAIN..the..ONE  HOTLINE 23:40, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

December 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Riley Costello, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  Rain  the 1  01:26, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

January 2012
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to List of Hollyoaks characters. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  Rain  the 1  00:41, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Digital Spy
Surprise - You still have not learnt what a source is - please find a source for Declan - please do not remove characters from templates based on gossip you heard at a forum. Rain  the 1  00:44, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Why do you never reply? Rain  the 1  00:54, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * You can press edit on your page here, and reply like you would on DS and save the page. :) You can sign your name by pressing this four times ~ I'd like it if you could reply because you've been editing for a a long time now and I've never been able to offer help properly. A lot of your edits end up being reverted because they do not have a source - just wanted to let you know why I keep giving warnings outm, I assumed you were ignoring that was all. Rain  the 1  01:02, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. Laurenlouiselawson (talk) 12:37, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 26
Hi. When you recently edited Kathleen Beedles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bryan Kirkwood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Cite your source
I've asked you before - many times - to cite sources. I understand the character is probably him - but there is no source. I knew this actor was joining last week and found no link to this character. We cannot add original research. I shall not ask again btw - I'll just alert an admin about your back catalogue of unsourced and unexplained additions and removals. Rain  the 1  23:48, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

It is like I said - I did my research - last week and found that the actor was deaf - linking him to the "Mikey" role. If you are getting annoyed, think how it makes those who follow the rules feel - when you swap and change as you please and never cite a source. You are not a reliable source and your original research is not permitted. You wouldn't have to keep rewriting it if you cite your source. Rain  the 1  00:00, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
Please do not just remove hidden comments like you did at Sharon Watts. Her return was announced before Bryan Kirkwood's departure which makes him the introducer for 2012, not Lorraine Newman.--5 albert square (talk) 23:30, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Loretta Jones, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. I also reverted your edit to the List of Hollyoaks characters article, as you did not provide a source or edit summary explaining why you removed content. - JuneGloom    Talk  16:42, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Loretta Jones, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bryan Kirkwood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

October 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Riley Costello, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.  Rain  the 1  23:08, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

February 2013
Hello, I'm Raintheone. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of Hollyoaks characters, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Please provide a source when adding new content such as dates that could potentially mislead readers  Rain  the 1  12:33, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)