User talk:Laurie nicholson

Welcome!
Hello, Laurie nicholson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

July 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=562508756 your edit] to Australian Army Training Team Vietnam may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:34, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
 * was provided by a crossbow which an AATTV member, who had been serving with the Nung tribal p eople, had left at the AATTV HQ offices for safe keeping, and which weapon is as iconic in Vietnam

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=563452272 your edit] to Australian Army Training Team Vietnam may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:49, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
 * |publisher= AATTV Association (Western Australia) Branch |author=Ryan, Rick |accessdate=4 July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=563645020 your edit] to Australian Army Training Team Vietnam may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:15, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
 * cite book | last=McNeill |first =Ian G. |title= The Team :Australian Army Advisors in Vietnam 1962-

Australian Army Training Team Vietnam
Helllo, Laurie, in regards to your recent additions to the Australian Army Training Team Vietnam article, can you please provide citations to reliable sources for this information? In order to establish verifiability, information added to Wikipedia articles should be backed up by referencing to sources such as books, journals, newspapers and websites. Without such referencing, the information is liable to be challenged and removed. If you need a hand understanding the mark up code/html etc., please let me know and I will be more than happy to help. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 07:04, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Hello again, Laurie. Thank you for adding the references; however, can you please add the url/html link for the website you have referenced and author, page number and ISBN details for the book so that readers may view these to verify your information? In relation to the following references "DRMS AB9755699 of 9 July 2012" and "OCA/OUT/2012/R11994006,of 20 Sep. 2012", these appear to be to letters/personal correspondence and as such in my opinion they do not meet the definition of a reliable source for Wikipedia's requirements (the website has its own definition). Can you please replace these with references to sources such as books, newspapers, journals or websites? While I am not doubting what you are saying, Wikipedia does not accept original research (which precludes or limits the use of most primary sources), and as editors we are required to follow this policy. If you cannot add references to such sources for that information I believe it should be removed. You could perhaps consider adding it to this site, where you already appear to be a contributor: If you have any questions about these policies, please let me know. I am happy to help. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 03:13, 4 July 2013 (UTC)