User talk:Lauro Sirgado

Welcome to Wikipedia!
 Hello Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of contents


 * Department directory

Need help?


 * Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
 * Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)


 * Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
 * The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
 * Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help


 * Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[File:Button sig.png]] or [[File:Insert-signature.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.


 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

---This should have been posted on your talk page and offered to you some time ago. Sorry about the delay. Chapada dos Veadeiros National Park, good luck, and have fun. – — &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (e • t • c) 16:30, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Please verify this:

 * Hi wiki


 * evaluate this
 * the wiki is for everyone?

Number one:
Original title:
 * 03:22, 4 June 2014‎ Rkitko (talk | contribs)‎ . . (69,494 bytes) (-143)‎ . . (Undid revision 611470107 by Lauro Sirgado (talk) - not the best image to illustrate this article; already well-illustrated, also we're not to sandwich text between media like that) (undo | thank)

Revert on carnivorous plant

Hi

This is a recent endemic specie (2003)

I would include this... but ok, ty

I'm tired of wiki

Lauro Sirgado (talk) 03:52, 4 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi, . Just to be clear, I reverted the edit because MOS:IMAGELOCATION suggests we avoid sandwiching the text of the article between two elements like the video and the image you added. Additionally, the article carnivorous plant is already well-illustrated. I will add your image to List of Drosera species. We don't yet have an article on Drosera tentaculata but we should! And your image would fit quite well there. Why not take the time to write the article on the species? Cheers, Rkitko (talk) 13:42, 4 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi


 * 03:22, 4 June 2014‎ Rkitko (talk | contribs)‎ . . (69,494 bytes) (-143)‎ . . (Undid revision 611470107 by Lauro Sirgado (talk) - not the best image to illustrate this article; already well-illustrated, also we're not to sandwich text between media like that) (undo | thank)


 * The reasons do not seem strong (sry my opinion).
 * Only stub are open for editions? I stop my editions.
 * Do not want to get into edit wars and Manors.
 * leave for others


 * thank you


 * Lauro Sirgado (talk) 14:06, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

II
Remove redundant image (Rkitko)

Hi, Rkitko

Not is a redundant figure, the figure illustrates one of the substrates of the the species occurring, such as the note explains:

refer: " Drosera tentaculata occurs in “campo rupestre” vegetation, usually in areas that suffer intense desiccation during the dry season, which is when flowering usually occurs (July to October). It is found predominantly among sparse grasses in fine white sand mixed with white quartz gravel, or in sand mixed with black humus, or even on bare sandstone surfaces."

cited text of:

Carnivorous Plant Newsletter Volume 32, Number 3, September 2003, pages 79-92 - Four New Species of Sundews, Drosera (Droseraceae), from Brazil

Again an exclusion which I do not agree, is this necessary?

I am very tired of the wiki, unfortunately

thank you

Lauro Sirgado (talk) 19:14, 6 June 2014 (UTC)


 * - It appears to be the same image that is in the taxobox just without the close image crop. It doesn't appear to add any information not already seen in the other image already present on the article. Wikipedia is not a repository of images and since there's so little text in this article, we can instead link to a Wikimedia Commons category that contains more images for people to browse. I will add the link. Cheers, Rkitko (talk) 21:30, 6 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi Rkitko


 * Seems to me that the context of the image is correct
 * and that the above information is relevant to the wiki...
 * and its users
 * but you decide


 * Lauro Sirgado (talk) 02:46, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

and...III
12:28, 7 June 2014‎ Rkitko (talk | contribs)‎. . (6,458 bytes) (-1,910)‎. . (Far too many indiscriminate images here. Wikipedia is WP:NOTREPOSITORY. See also WP:IG. A link to the Commons gallery already exists -- no need to duplicate it here) (undo | thank)

How should I proceed?

 * I quit my edits?
 * This is acceptable to the wiki?

Lauro Sirgado (talk) 13:11, 7 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Hello . There are many rules and policies that govern what is and what is not acceptable in articles.  I've posted a basic welcome template at the top of this page with some useful links to various things you will need to know to make acceptable edits on Wikipedia.  I surely would encourage you to not give up; you are apparently a good faith editor, and that is the first part of being a successful volunteer editor on the English Wikipedia. :) — &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (e • t • c) 16:30, 8 June 2014 (UTC)