User talk:Lavarball13/sandbox

Peer Review
You did an excellent job of adding new and important information to the already existing article. The tone is for the most part neutral but I believe to eliminate any bias it would be best to remove language that highlights Code For America. For example, when you state "Just days after the world shut down and logged online because of COVID-19". Perhaps you could remove the "Just days" section as it persuades us in believing how fast and efficient they were. Additionally, I would try to use a greater variety of sources as the majority originate from Code For America's website. But overall the content added is great and up to date! Gobears18 (talk) 03:18, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Peer Review SF
Great job on this article, adding new and relevant information. My best suggestion would be to start inserting hyperlinks for topics which have Wikipedia articles. I also agree with the above comment regarding wording, but every else is neutral in my eyes. I may be wrong, but I don't think it's recommended to use the website of the article you're working on, as a source -- so maybe try to find other outside articles which mention the same things and use those as sources instead of citations 7-10, also, you can remove duplicate citations 8 and 10 if you'd like. Really good work! SeenaBerkeley (talk) 04:01, 18 October 2022 (UTC)