User talk:Laveol/2011/September

OR?
You are right, I should have discussed it first. My apologies. It seems very very ORish, especially in this circumstance, for the footnote to "justify" the second number. I mean, the number (The 6,000,000 one) does not reflect the official census results from the BSI, but rather seems to reflect what "would have" or "should have" happened. What is your take on the matter? Lunch for Two (talk) 01:57, 2 September 2011 (UTC)


 * [That] source was for the second number but it was removed in the revert. Dinner for three (talk) 13:10, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Second Bulgarian Empire
Greetings, Laveol! Can you please try to cope with the vandalism of the article about the Second Empire? A user is simply putting text out of the context without realizing that Romanian-Bulgaria is not alternative or a synonym of the country during its existence. I am really busy with my master's thesis and constant interview and I have no time to argue with such persons now :( Regards, --Gligan (talk) 14:07, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Please stop calling my edits vandalism. You are trying to eliminate a sentence supported by a RS. On the other hand, I am asking Laveol to stop reverting me without explanation. I would prefer an answer on the article talk page instead. (SamiraJ (talk) 14:24, 2 September 2011 (UTC))

Reverting an article with unverifiable contents
Laveol, since you asked me why the entry was deleted for More Sokol Pie, here is the reason:

At the bottom of every time one enters something, it says: "Encyclopedic content must be verifiable."

The Link will take you to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability

The threshold for inclusion of information in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth – whether readers can check that it has already been published by a reliable source, not whether editors think it is true.

Anything challenged or likely to be challenged

All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable published source using an inline citation. Cite the source clearly and precisely, with page numbers where applicable.

Burden of evidence

The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material. You may remove any material lacking a reliable source that directly supports it.

The entry has no references whatsoever and independently, I have not been able to find a single source online that backs up that entry. Since you reversed it, please verify the content of that article with reliable published sources, as suggested by the policy.

Thank you.

Wisco2000 (talk) 23:23, 8 September 2011 (UTC)


 * You have been provided with enough references and you refuse to read them. It is a simple sentence in an article and is substantially referenced. I suggest you found a way to make the article better or something, instead of making up silly arguments. I will refrain from answering any more similar inquiries since they have been answered many times until now. You just refuse to read them. Plus, you got the opinion of an Admin. Even moreover, the article was named a Good Article by Wikipedia criteria with that statement in it. Silly edit wars like the one you have started could only ruin the article. Thank you and, please, spare me any further similar comments. -- L a v e o l  T 06:39, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Dude, you're talking about the wrong article.

So much for who's reading, I guess.

Wisco2000 (talk) 07:27, 9 September 2011 (UTC)


 * I agree the stuff about singers might be redundant. But your edit-summary stated something else. And you again removed a perfectly valid statement. Are you saying it is not popular in Bulgaria? Do you really need sources for that or you are just pecking around? Cause this is what it looks like. -- L a v e o l  T 07:34, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 September 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:08, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi :)
Hi, thanks for requsting these pictures, they would be very useful :) I'll try to have a look at your improvements to Kaloyan of Bulgaria tomorrow. All the best,  — Toдor Boжinov — 19:37, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 September 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 23:51, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 September 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 09:56, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 September 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:44, 27 September 2011 (UTC)