User talk:Lavinan26

April 2016
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Singam II. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Diff:  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:17, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Cyphoidbomb. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Diffs: Blogs should not be used as references per the obvious note that you somehow missed. See WP:UGC and WP:RS.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:26, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Singam II. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''Diff: As noted, blogs may not be used as references. Your second submission of tamilboxoffice1.com does not meet our reliable sources guidelines. We're only interested in what reliable published sources with established reputations for fact-checking and clear editorial policies have to say about any given subject. You are welcome to open a discussion on the article's talk page to explain why you think this source should be included, but until you have consensus for inclusion, the site should not be used. Note also that the tone of your submission is inappropriately promotional. Wikipedia doesn't care about "100 crore club" labels. Thank you.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:28, 21 April 2016 (UTC)