User talk:Law Lord/Archive 4

Endorse notice
As per your request, I was more than willing to endorse your comments here Requests_for_comment/Law_Lord. I don't like how that all went down regarding your userpage. If you're not successful, I'm making it clear that I feel the comments were unjustly removed from your userpage and SheffieldSteel had no business accusing you of personally attacking him. If anything, hopefully that makes you feel better. If there's anything else I can do, let me know. Cheers! Cheers dude (talk) 06:13, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Cheers Dude
Haha! I take it you've noticed the unjust attacks I'm receiving from admin Guy on the administrative noticeboards. Honestly, this is why I get involved and try to help out in disputes of this site. I see so much unjust attacks and behavior like this, where I feel there must be so many other users being treated the same way, so I try to step in and look at the situation in great detail before providing my honest opinion of the matter because it seems that is a major issue with this place. Thank you for your advice. I will try to get a request for comment! Cheers! =) Cheers dude (talk) 21:03, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

I see that administrator Guy also commented on this page under my comment. Funny how people who have disagreed with you in the past turn up again, eh? lol! Cheers! Cheers dude (talk) 21:07, 21 December 2008 (UTC)


 * I am just amazed at how much time some users seem to be using on finding faults with other users. My RFC was not started to find fault with other users but simply to combat an extreme action against my user page. Yet, as things unfold, some people seem to spend quite a lot of their wiki-time being vindictive and addressing any issue, which they hope would discredit fellow users. Really a shame to see! --Law Lord (talk) 23:04, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

You're kidding right? Of course I've noticed. None of this is the real world though (Thank God!) so I don't take any of the antics played here seriously. There's all types of games and antics that go on, from loads of unjust administrative actions, siding with others based on every irrelevant thing other than the situation, bringing up ancient past to get so and so in trouble, hating on one person just because there are a couple others doing it, etc. It goes on and on. I don't engage in any of it because we're all anonymous and none of it means anything. I just get a kick out of it when I see others engaging in it because it's like what's the point off all that? None of it is going to further these people in the real world or get them any recognition in real life whatsoever. Now I can see a reason for someone like Simon Cowell to engage in that type of behavior because it may bring American Idol more ratings but here? Come on. It's a username for crying out loud. Just behave like adults! Cheers =) Cheers dude (talk) 15:28, 22 December 2008 (UTC)


 * And that's where you're wrong. We're trying to build a free encyclopedia, that anyone can use and change for the better. If you're here to be disruptive or simply can't take it seriously then Wikipedia isn't the place for you. Right now I'm all for removing the PAs, and auguring about it and making a shitstorm of a scene isn't helpful.   CWii ( Talk  00:19, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar
Thank you for the barnstar! Cla68 (talk) 07:01, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks as well. *Dan T.* (talk) 13:09, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

That was very sweet of you. =) I'm touched. Thank you! Cheers_Dude (talk) 10:13, 25 December 2008 (UTC)