User talk:Lawann

Recent edits to Violence against Indians in Australia controversy
Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Epicgenius (talk) 16:31, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Epicgenius (talk) 16:48, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating WP:SOAPBOX and per WP:NOTHERE. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. GiantSnowman 16:52, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Freedom of speech
I saw that you referred to freedom of speech as a reason why your additions should be allowed on wikipedia. Freedom of speech has nothing to do with it. It's not the government that runs wikipedia, and it's not the government that keeps removing your additions.

If you were to start up a website where people could add content, you'd be the one who decided which additions should be allowed, wouldn't you? And if you removed content – from your website – that you thought shouldn't be there, what would you say to those who started yelling about freedom of speech? You'd say "Hey, it's my website, I call the shots here", wouldn't you?

Well, in this place, wikipedia calls the shots.

Editing wikipedia is a privilege, not an entitlement. And as other privileges, it might be revoked.

See What Wikipedia is not, especially section Community.

Regards.

HandsomeFella (talk) 19:25, 11 January 2014 (UTC)