User talk:Lawiggins/sandbox

In tonight's class we looked at the Wiki article Ecology of Florida. We all agreed it was poorly written, bias and contained little to no good sources. Lawiggins (talk) 23:38, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review
You did a good job organizing this information so it is clear and easily understandable. Under deep water coral banks, first word should be "in". The section "threats to coral reefs.." is on there twice. You have a lot of good sources and everything is cited well. The middle of the management section might want to be reworded where the quote is. You mentioned in class over doing the links, however I think you use it appropriately. Overall, great job! Westervelt h (talk) 02:26, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Peer review from katfish68
I corrected a typo otherwise looks great! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katfish301 (talk • contribs) 19:36, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Peer review from Dr. Smith
Some suggested edits: I suggest changing your "coral reef" link in the "Tropical the Shallow-Water Coral Reefs" header to the paragraph below. The first sentence "Tropical shallow-water coral reefs..." is a perfect spot. Under Deep-water Coral Banks, I think you might mean: "In depths of 400-800 meters" instead of "Is..." Here: "There is also the intrinsic value " you end abruptly. I think there was more you wanted to say here? You have this header twice "Threats to coral reefs in Florida". delete the second. I think "break up of management..." should be changed to "the disparate management authorities..."

Laura, this is really great and I learned a lot about corals by reading your article! Polish it off and you have a good article here! Oikos6933 (talk) 16:30, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Everyone, thank you so much for the feedback. Your input improved the article. Thank you!! Lawiggins (talk) 16:50, 29 November 2018 (UTC)