User talk:Lawman25

AfD Nomination: Practical Alternatives to Congestion Pricing
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem to me that Practical Alternatives to Congestion Pricing meets these criteria, I have started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Practical Alternatives to Congestion Pricing. Don't forget to add four tildes ( ~ ) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. Tinlinkin 11:51, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Congestion pricing theory
I assume that you are the person from Brooklyn Law School who has been posting a theory about alternatives to congestion pricing. You should be aware that the theory is original research, which is not allowed on Wikipedia. Unless your proposal has been published and has been reported and critiqued by secondary sources, it would be original research. Also, since this appears to be advancing one point of view, it may also violate the neutral point of view policy on Wikipedia. Please review the content policy links above. Thank you.Tinlinkin 11:56, 25 June 2007 (UTC)