User talk:Lawren22

August 2017
Hello, I'm Andy Dingley. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Bracelet have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:21, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

NO ONE will tell me what is incorrect about this article. I have reached out to 2 moderators. This is odd that the community seems unwilling to say what the issue is as everything is cited by a reputable newspaper.

Welcome!
Hello, Lawren22, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Andy Dingley (talk) 18:50, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kate Maberly. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 21:17, 2 August 2017 (UTC)


 * To be more specific, you are repeatedly deleting content without valid reason e.g., especially the tag which calls for better referencing (as required by WP:BLP, WP:RS, WP:V). Once additional citations are added, particularly more reliable sources, the banner requesting additional citations can be removed.
 * But a more serious issue is that you have indicated you are editing on behalf of a friend. Therefore you need to take some time to read and understand Wikipedia's Conflict of Interest policy before continuing with further edits on Kate Maberly. Dl2000 (talk) 21:38, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Everything added in factual information that has a published article - variety etc. My whole purpose is to get rid of that ugly box. at this point I believe everything is validated. from newspaperand magazine articles. I truly am trying to do this right. I promise to never try to edit a wiki page after this. ever. this is very confusing. I believe i am following the rules.

Sorry for the typos in this reply.

Please tell we what is left to be cited. so I can get that awful box removed. I have reviewed the article and everything is cited. I so appreciate your help.

NO ONE will tell me what is incorrect about this article. I have reached out to 2 moderators. This is odd that the community seems unwilling to say what the issue is as everything is cited by a reputable newspaper.