User talk:LawrenceRRohr

Editors of Wikipedia, Thank you for your excellent presentation of information. I use your resources often. I have recently become very interested in the lecture and written material offered by Dr. Stephen Meyer. As I researched further into his biography, using Wikipedia as a resource, I came away with the disconcerting feeling that Wikipedia may have a predisposition toward Scientific Materialism versus an openness to Intelligent Design and its philosophy of life's origins. As I read your biographic article on Dr. Meyer, I immediately encountered your description of his credentials as "pseudoscience". To substantiate my impression, the article attempted to delegitimize Dr. Meyer's claim that the established Scientific community has in no way been guilty of persecuting proponents of Intelligent Design. Having raised my children with the help of the Public Schools, I can assure you there is a strong pre-disposition of disdain toward anything implying that we came from a creative act. With that said, I would like to suggest that history will establish scientifically that we are indeed the product of a creative act and not thru the process of Natural Selection. It might be worth your time to become more familiar with his writings and lectures on a personal basis, so that when the Scientific Community finally begins to see the rational of his research, Wikipedia will have already made the bold admission that Intelligent Design not only makes "common sense", it makes scientific and mathematical sense. Thank you, Lawrence R. Rohr