User talk:Lawrence Creeger

July 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page The National Monument to the U.S. Constitution has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bexample\.com (links: http://www.example.com ). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:19, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The National Monument to the U.S. Constitution
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The National Monument to the U.S. Constitution, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Appears to be a hoax, no cited sources.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mad Pierrot (talk) 03:56, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The National Monument to the U.S. Constitution
A tag has been placed on The National Monument to the U.S. Constitution requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mad Pierrot (talk) 00:19, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Constitutional Monument w-Reagan 001.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Constitutional Monument w-Reagan 001.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mad Pierrot (talk) 00:48, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

HelpMe This Monument represents the ONLY Monument dedicated to the United States Constitution by the United States Government. It is a symbol of America's protected freedoms and certainly deserves a place in Wikipedia. While the author of this article is also President of The American Constitution Spirit Corporation who owns the WEB site www.Spiritoffreedomtour.org, a 501c2 foundation, every effort is being made to just give the facts concerning this American Heritage art and symbol. --Lawrence Creeger (talk) 05:01, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for your cooperation


Mad Pierrot (talk) has given you a cup of coffee, for taking the time to weather a dispute. Thanks for staying calm and civil! Coffee somehow promotes WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a coffee, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or someone putting up with some stick at this time. Enjoy!

Spread the lovely, warm, bitter goodness of coffee by adding {{subst:WikiCoffee}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thank you for being so cooperative and civil. It makes it much more pleasant to be a Wikipedian. Mad Pierrot (talk) 06:18, 10 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Larry,


 * I've removed the speedy deletion tags and edited the talk page on The National Monument to the U.S. Constitution. Sorry about all the trouble, I may have been overzealous when nominating the article for deletion.  Good luck and I hope I didn't scare you away from contributing further to Wikipedia.  [mad pierrot]  [t   c]  07:38, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Not at all, you just made me work harder at understanding Wikipedia. I hope to be able to contribute significantly in the future. --Lawrence Creeger (talk) 03:59, 12 July 2009 (UTC)


 * So do you think you're going to submit The National Monument to the U.S. Constitution to articles for creation? I still think you should.  [mad pierrot]  [t   c]  19:40, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

I'm fully planning to submit it once I finish the article. There is a lot more to go and I'm going to need more time once I get back from my trip. Thanks for the encouragement.--98.244.72.159 (talk) 21:39, 12 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I think you should consider taking down the page as it is right now, and creating a subpage within your user page, like at User:Lawrence Creeger/National Monument, and continuing to work on the article there. A third opinion was provided on the talk page here in case you didn't see it.  In order to request for the article to be deleted, you would type (or copy and paste) this text:
 * &#123;&#123;db-author&#125;&#125;
 * onto the top of the page. First you would obviously want to copy the text you already have, so it is not deleted.  Let me know if you have any more questions.  [mad pierrot]  [t   c]  22:02, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of The National Monument to the U.S. Constitution
I have nominated The National Monument to the U.S. Constitution, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/The National Monument to the U.S. Constitution. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  [mad pierrot] [t   c]  06:18, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Image tagged
I undeleted and tagged the image.  MBisanz  talk 06:24, 18 July 2009 (UTC)