User talk:Lawson87

Misleading edit summaries
Please be careful not to use misleading edit summaries. This clearly is not a spelling correction, and this clearly is not grammar. Absent a reliable central authority regulating use of onion urls, any change in url or introduction of a new url needs to be accompanied by a reliable source. Thanks. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 02:24, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Hmmm. Looking closer I may have misunderstood what you were doing. At first it looked like you tried to change the url multiple times, but I see now that you just switched between two and ultimately switched back to the original -- the one supported by the source. The edit summary is still misleading, but I see it was a good faith edit. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 02:27, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
This is your only warning; if you insert a malware link to Wikipedia again, as you did at AlphaBay, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Toddst1 (talk) 18:22, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:27, 30 January 2017 (UTC)