User talk:Lawson m

August 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Australian Securities Exchange, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Australian Securities Exchange was changed by Lawson m (u) (t) deleting 18635 characters on 2010-08-26T23:44:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 23:44, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Australian Securities Exchange
Please make sure that additions/changes to articles are written in a neutral tone. An encyclopedia article is not supposed to sound like the subject's web page. ... disco spinster   talk  00:19, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

August 2010
The recent edit you made to Australian Securities Exchange constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. Funandtrvl (talk) 00:25, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Please do not add controversial and/or unsourced content to the Australian Securities Exchange article w/o first discussing the changes on the article's talk pg or at WP:FINANCE. Thank you, --Funandtrvl (talk) 00:31, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * This is a second request to please not add promotional material to the ASX article. Since you said you work for the exchange, please read Wikipedia's policy on conflict of interest. Also, please do not delete the info about the history of the exchange, the article needs to be encyclopedic, not a press release for your company. --Funandtrvl (talk) 01:33, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Perhaps I can help here. Lawson, thank you for acknowledging you work for ASX. Obviously you have first-hand knowledge of the organisation that means you can see ways in which the article could be improved. And, true, the article is pretty dreadful :-). However, as you can see from the notes left by other editors above, there is considerable concern about the scop for introducing overly promotional material into the article. The best way for you to participate in improving the article is to post proposed amendments on the article talk page. There, other editors can examine them and, if they think they improve the article, then other editors can transfer them into the article. One of the key things needed in the process is reliable sources provided in the form of inline citations. Here's an example, using text that you proposed for inclusion, but to which I have added a citation: "ASX Group can be described as a multi-asset class and vertically integrated exchange group. Its activities include primary and secondary market services, including the raising, allocation and hedging of capital flows, trading and price discovery (Australian Securities Exchange); central counterparty risk transfer (via subsidiaries of ASX Clearing Corporation); and securities settlement for both the equities and fixed income markets (via subsidiaries of ASX Settlement Corporation)." (Note however not all the facts in your text - particularly the names of which subsidiary does what task - are on that webpage, so another source, perhaps from elsewhere on the ASX's site, would ultimately be needed to cover all the facts). Once you placed the above on the talk page, an editor such as myself can come along, assess it, and then add it if it seems like a good idea. Which i will now do. Regards, hamiltonstone (talk) 01:43, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * PS If you want to delete text from the article (perhaps it is inaccurate, out of date, or unencyclopedic - the article is full of such rubbish, frankly), then copy and paste it on the article talk page with a note saying you think this should be deleted, and explaining briefly why. hamiltonstone (talk) 01:52, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Recent addition at ASX
Hi - just letting you know i reverted a recent addition you made - that text had already been added in the body of the article. Some of it still needs references though :-) hamiltonstone (talk) 04:58, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Sydney Exchange Square entrance.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sydney Exchange Square entrance.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 11:11, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Photo of the entrance of Sydney Exchange Square building.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Photo of the entrance of Sydney Exchange Square building.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 11:31, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)