User talk:Laynap

Welcome!
Hello, Laynap, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:31, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

March 2024
Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Amniotic stem cells, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adakiko (talk) 12:19, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Amniotic stem cells, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 12:29, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
 * You are removing citations. Please don't do that without giving a valid reason. Content needs to be wp:verifiable. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 12:30, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

April 2024
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Amniotic stem cells, you may be blocked from editing. ''As noted before, not only are you adding unsourced text, but you're removing sourced text. I strongly suggest you discuss this matter at Talk:Amniotic stem cells and get consensus before attempting to change the article again.'' —C.Fred (talk) 12:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
 * One other note about that edit. Making such a major change with an edit summary of "edited for grammer" [sic] completely misrepresents what you were trying to do in the edit. That could be viewed as intent to deceive, which would be dealt with as vandalism or other intentionally disruptive editing. —C.Fred (talk) 12:19, 11 April 2024 (UTC)