User talk:LazyTiger

Password
Dear Lazytiger, I hope you don't forget your password once again. Please sign your comments on talk by inserting ~ or using the signature button. Dont type the four tildes within [ ]. Wish you well on wikiediting. -Pournami 05:22, 5 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Hi, now that we're agreed on the fact that hindu is left leaning, can i replace our last exchange["unnecessary discourse"] on the hindu talk page with a sane summarizing of the conversation? Thanks, Pournami 17:32, 6 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Hello,


 * You are free to do whatever you want. You dont need to ask my permission to do something. LazyTiger 17:40, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks. In wiki, people try to be cordial, and try being polite to others, and always ask for permission before editing another's comments, or, if in process of summarising another's comments there is some truncation let it be known that the orig comment has been edited. it is generally depreciated to edit another's comments. please review my edit to see if its ok-Pournami 19:09, 6 April 2006 (UTC)


 * It is ironical that you are asking me to be polite and cordial, given your free usage of sarcasm. But most of us generally dont practise what we preach. Do we? LazyTiger 17:47, 7 April 2006 (UTC)


 * I don't ask you to be p/c; its general practice, i meant. i only meant, a few days ago, that its general practce to be so, that was why it was necessary i asked you before i edited your comment. if it offended you(my deleting of a portion of your talk with what i had mistaken to be your permission to do so when you said "you're free to, no need to ask" ). let us say i have given up the idea of trying to sound polite. i have decided to neither preach nor practise politeness henceforth. you are free to delete all "unnecessary discourse" by me at the hindu talk. this is "explicit consent" for *deleting* parts of my comments on the hindu talk page of wikipedia which you regard as "unnecessary discourse". i did not *edit* any of your comments, ie, i did not *change your words*; i only deleted parts of it, (with what i had mistaken at that time to be your assent for doing so); with notice that *i* was *deleting* words at this point in the text. if it was inappropriate, i will restore as it was before. but you have to tell me if you want that to be done. henceforth, on the hindu talk only, if we two have some unnecessary discourse, i give u permission to delete that part of my comments which you think constitutes this offense. for a start, i am deleting the portion of the last conversation by me which you labelled as unnecessary discourse. if you disagree even on that, then.. (btw, if this message on your page sounds offensive/sarcastic: since it is ur page, you can delete this without notice)(yeah: i forgot to sign in when i made this edit --Pournami 10:31, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Regarding Boston: i asked him for an intervention in our "conflict", what do you think of his proposal. you can reply here, or on his talk page or my talk page. do you agree not to revert me without either a 24-hour wait or a consensus regarding revert ? this applying only to "reverting" and not to "adding/inserting" words/sentences ? this arrangement coming into effect only after both of us explicitly agree on this ? oh yeah: i apologize for any offensive statements made by me towards you until now. -Pournami 10:31, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Hello, I will not delete anything that you or any other member writes in the talk page. I dont know if permission is the right word but you are free to make a summary of the talk and I only request you not to delete any of mine. Of course, you can still delete them if you want to. And btw, you dont need to restore any of the comments already deleted. You dont need to apologize for anything because I am not offended.

Regarding the Article -

I see that some changes have been made by you. My first question is - Why did you remove POV? I am not insisting on a POV but from my side, I have no objection for a POV. I have to go through the article to ask other questions. You can reply in the talk page.

Regarding BostonMA: I have no problem with waiting for 24 hours. If I make any change, it will only be after 24 hours and I wil remember to explain changes in the talk page. If I forget, you or anyone else can remind me.

LazyTiger 19:38, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Edit Conflict at The Hindu
Hi Lazytiger, I am writing to you regarding an edit conflict that is occuring at The Hindu. I believe that Pournami has been working hard to help establish a neutral point of view for The Hindu. You and Pournami have discussed quite a bit in the talk pages and that is good. Pournami believes in the importance of discussion, rather than edit warring, and so do I. I think that one way that editting of the Hindu might be made more harmonious would be if you and Pournami were to agree that, as a courtesy, neither would revert the other except after a 24 hour wait, or by mutual agreement that a revert should be made. Please let me know what you think of such an arrangement. Sincerely, --BostonMA 12:45, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

I replied in the talk page.

LazyTiger 19:39, 8 April 2006 (UTC)