User talk:Lboken

July 2013
Hello, I'm GSK. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Sims 3, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 18:32, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

there is a probleme you deleted my addition here a good proof that its real. http://www.amazon.fr/The-Sims-starter-bundle-anglais/dp/B00COK9VD6/ref=sr_1_fkmr1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1373270555&sr=8-2-fkmr1&keywords=the+sims+3+starter+pack explaine me why me i have to proof what say and others didnt why my addition had to have a  citation   or refference  when its in store and yet other like univercity or  supernatural they doesnt have to have one ?????? that is just wrong to delete others work just cause you dont want some one to post something cause you didn thave the proof  like others did

so basicaly waht you says is if you arent a member of my kliq  you have no right to post new information on the wikipedia website. fine i wont edit any more what the use even when i show you proff you refuse them you just  remove the one who arent in your kliq   post so that only you and your friends can help wikipedia wish  make even more unreliable   the wikipedia since only a few can  add to it   even with source and proof.

Talkback
GSK ● ✉ ✓ 15:02, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian again, as you did at User talk:GSK, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 02:13, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

The Sims 3
You were told store sites like Amazon were not reliable sources, and you chose to ignore it, and on top of that, you felt it was necessary to harass me. I and at least one other editor have tried to explain policy to you, but you would rather ignore it and claim there's a "kliq." I have no sympathy for someone who is unwilling to learn. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 03:14, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok, I'll try one more time. Everything on Wikipedia must be sourced to reliable, independent sources: see WP:IRS or WP:SOURCES for more info there.  Amazon.com is not a reliable source, because pretty much anyone can sell something there.  Now, in one of your posts you mentioned, which is a slightly better source in this case.  So, here's my suggestion: take a look at the referencing guide for beginners, and edit the article again, this time just using the one source.


 * A few things, though. Vandalism has a very narrow definition on Wikipedia, and what GSK and I were doing does not constitute vandalism.  Second, there is no "kliq" of editors running the The Sims 3 page.  Before today, I had not edited the Sims 3 page, nor had I ever edited the same page as GSK.  I hope my advice helps, and I look forward to seeing you contribute positively to Wikipedia.  Howicus (talk) 03:32, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 03:56, 9 July 2013 (UTC) .
 * If another admin wants to unblock you, that's fine with me, however I have a hard time accepting your sincerity with your edits. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 04:12, 9 July 2013 (UTC)