User talk:Lc2001

Speedy deletion nomination of Focus on Energy


A tag has been placed on Focus on Energy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mean as custard (talk) 15:28, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

A warning
I've reverted the article Focus on Energy to a neutrally worded one. This is the second time you have added your promotional version - User:Mean as custard also set the article back to an encyclopaedic version, but you re-added your version. Please read WP:COI (conflict of interest) as I feel absolutely certain that you are working for or on behalf of Focus on Energy. Also, you should read WP:SPAM and realise that promotion and advertising are not allowed here. A different administrator might have deleted the article without looking into the history. There is no objection to you making factual additions or updates to the article, provided that you adhere to our policy of neutral wording and viewpoint - see WP:NPOV and WP:PEACOCK. I have added the article to my watchlist and will be keeping an eye on it. Peridon (talk) 18:26, 17 November 2013 (UTC)