User talk:LcawteHuggle

Why does this account exist?
Huggle isn't a bot, it doesn't require a bot account. Gurch (talk) 22:07, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Its not a bot account. Its a legit alt account so that I dont have my Huggle edits hogging up my contribs. Admin Pedro said it was ok... --LcawteHuggle (talk) 12:15, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Indeed it is. As long as this account is linked to your main account, it's fine.
 * I'll likely use an alt account myself if I get back into Huggle. I really don't need the kind of watchlist bloat that comes from Recent Changes patrolling on this account. -- King Öomie  15:26, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of The 1933 Agreement of Iran
An article that you have been involved in editing, The 1933 Agreement of Iran, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. andy (talk) 15:30, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Fixing link rot
What's the problem with using the wayback machine to repair an obsolete link at Invented Here? And how does it help matters to reinstate a reference that doesn't work? PMLawrence (talk) 10:41, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Warnings
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Release of information department. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Scruff323 (talk) 15:52, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

September 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Beavercreek High School has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you.  Blue Rasberry  16:46, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above notice which I posted is definitely my mistake. You removed obvious vandalism, and I reverted your removal of this back to the vandalized version.  I apologize.  Thanks for doing a good job at keeping the article clean.  You can remove the template if you like, or just keep it now that it has a compliment attached to it.  Blue Rasberry  16:56, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

The NEP article changes you reverted
That entire 'Beginnings' section of the article is uncited and unsourced. It features grave examples of propaganda and misrepresentation of the 'beginnings' of the New Economic Policy. Why were the {Cn}s reverted?

random talk page spam
i c u mr cawte Ajraddatz (Talk) 21:30, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Ah my gosh.. -- Lcawte / WebCoder11 (Talk) 22:01, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Revert
It wasn't a mistake, it's actually correct. --KalamazooGuy (talk) 13:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
 * There's very little on Wikipedia that requires the box. Particularly not a page on an actress. It also doesn't need 4 categories about the descent of a person, particularly when they conflict and no information on that is listed in the article. --Lewis Cawte (Talk) 13:06, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Revert
I have no idea why you deleted the latest changes to the Willow River article, as I previously expanded the article. User:DMBanks 13:25, 7 November 2017