User talk:Lccc84

Speedy deletion of Lori Cotler
A tag has been placed on Lori Cotler requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JD554 (talk) 13:54, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

if you are Lori Cotler or connected to her
You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to No original research, Neutral point of view, and Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedians with articles.) Jon513 (talk) 15:24, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of Lori Cotler
Thank you for contacting me. The main reason the article was deleted is because of copyright infringement. We cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

The second problem is that you have a conflict of interest in regards to this article. Articles written by people who have a conflict often often have multiple problems.
 * They are often biased, usually positively. People will write overly positively about themselves, and often present opinions as facts.  Wikipedia aims to avoid presenting opinions as facts. (Neutral point of view does not mean simply writing in the third person).
 * They can be unverifiable. If the only source for a particular fact about you is you yourself, then readers cannot verify it.  (One common area where this is the case is with hopes, dreams, thoughts, and aspirations.  There is no way for readers to verify what you think.) Everything in Wikipedia articles must be verifiable.
 * They can contain original research. People often include in autobiographies information that has never been published before, or which is the result of firsthand knowledge. This type of information would require readers to perform primary research in order to verify it. Wikipedia is not a publisher of first instance; original research is not permitted in Wikipedia.

Wikipedia is "the encyclopedia that anyone can edit," but if you have a conflict of interest avoid, or exercise great caution when editing articles related to you (or your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with etc), or linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

The last problem is that the article may not met the notability criteria for inclusion. If the article is recreated it would likely be deleted for that reason. If you have any further questions you can contact me on my talk page. Jon513 (talk) 11:37, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Lori.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Lori.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. JD554 (talk) 11:44, 26 February 2008 (UTC)