User talk:Lchcheng

February 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe our core policies. ''Your edits correspond to the issues you are editing, but the current references cited cannot be used to analyze the statements you have made. Please adhere to Wikipedia's NPOV policies as well as provide additional references supporting your statements before placing your material back on to the article.'' - Jameson L. Tai  talk ♦ contribs 05:12, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * And you should remember that I know who you are. You are 75.84.237.107 and please stop promoting your view. &mdash; B o L 05:17, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Zedla (talk) 09:41, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Regarding this
Hi there. I noticed your post at User:Jamesontai, and would like to clarify a couple of things.

There are actually three distinct messages above: the first a template message from User:Jamesontai asking that you adhere to one of Wikipedia's core policies, Neutral point of view; the third another templated message warning from User:Zedla about the possibility that you might be coming close to breaking the Three-revert rule, a major breach of on-wiki ettiquite, and the second a message from User:Blow of Light (using the abbreviated signature "BoL") which apparently (and perhaps incorrectly) assumed your familiarity with the three revert rule, and was (also perhaps incorrectly) assuming that you were trying to duck it by continuing to edit war under a different identifier than you used at first (your IP vs. this username). See the history of the article in question, and leave a message on its discussion page (just click the "discussion" tab on that page), and you can discuss the change you want made without having to edit war over it. Leave a message on my discussion/talk page if you have any questions. Thanks. --Dynaflow  babble  13:55, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Regarding your comment on my user page
Your additions to my personal user page has been reverted without being read. It will not be read. If you have a comment you would like to send me, please post it on my user talk page by following the detailed instructions I have given at the top of the page. If your post was regarding your posts/my vand reverts on Lowell High School (San Francisco), let me refer you to the Talk:Lowell High School (San Francisco) page, where you may discuss the article's content in detail. Other than that, please do not post unauthorized material on my user page again, as it is considered disruptive behavior. - Jameson L. Tai  talk ♦ contribs 17:31, 4 February 2008 (UTC)