User talk:Lcodyh803/Archive 3

January 2020
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Kevin Lilliana, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Migsmigss (talk) 17:15, 20 January 2020 (UTC)


 * , I really don't think it's appropriate to leave an only-warning message about something that was clearly not vandalism. You should read WP:VD before you make any accusations like this. Also I think its ridiculous that you think I could be blocked for that. Lcodyh803 (talk) 17:38, 20 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi, User:Lcodyh803. Your edit allowed a non-confirmed IP to delete substantial amount of referenced content. The problem with said edit was not the references or the redundancy of said references at all, but the fact that it deleted a significant amount of referenced content, and only described said edit with "too much references or redundant references." Since you undid my edit and thus allowed the deletion of said content, this warning is valid. Please carefully review edits before undoing them moving forward, or I will have to escalate your activity to incidents' noticeboard. Thanks. Migsmigss (talk) 17:42, 20 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Also, this isn't a vandalism warning, for your information. This is a content removal warning, which you did and allowed, as evidenced by your undoing my edit and reinstating the edit done by the unconfirmed IP, which deleted referenced content from the page. Thanks. Migsmigss (talk) 17:45, 20 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi. I see you've blanked this section. Please do not blank sections, even on your talk page, if you have not yet addressed said issue. Will take note if you blank this again, as you can do so. But the next time you undo edits without reviewing them carefully, allowing deletion of content, I will have to raise your activity to admins' noticeboard. Thanks.Migsmigss (talk) 18:18, 20 January 2020 (UTC)


 * You deleted this section with the description/note "nope, go be aggressive somewhere else," which clearly doesn't help address said issue nor further Wikipedia's principles. Please carefully review edits before undoing them next time. Thanks. Migsmigss (talk) 18:20, 20 January 2020 (UTC)


 * since you obviously have some personal stake in this now for some reason, I will say this. Go be aggressive somewhere else. Even if i did make a mistake, that does not excuse your aggressive behavior. On that edit you removed an image and added back a lot of redundant refs, so yes, i reverted it. Do i admit i was wrong, after looking at it closer? Yes. But i only had good intentions with that edit, and i was just patrolling recent changes. I cant be expected to look at all 3000 characters that changed, I looked at the image removal and redundant refs, and reverted. You came back to my page to...what? Have the last word? I'm not sure what you're trying to accomplish with that, but it certainly does not make you look good, and I don't believe you have handled this situation very well. I wanted to remove an unneeded warning from an aggressive editor. It's my talk page, and there are no issues to resolve. I'd appreciate it if you thought long and hard before leaving another unnecessarily rude comment. Lcodyh803 (talk) 18:32, 20 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the reply. Yes, I expect you to carefully review edits, and even more so on when undoing edits. That's what we editors on Wikipedia are here for. Where was I aggressive? Continue hurling unfounded comments and I will report you for uncivility, first for calling me names, second for refusing to discuss this issue respectfully, and third, for deleting this section and making a note calling me aggressive. It is an editor's job to review edits carefully, as well as review edits done by others before undoing them. Thanks.Migsmigss (talk) 18:41, 20 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The aggressiveness comes from the fourth level warning. Any editor will notice the lack of AGF there, and I apologize if that set me off, I just dont think that was appropriate for an edit done in good faith. You cant give a fourth level warning and threaten to block every time someone makes a mistake. Lcodyh803 (talk) 19:08, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

You've got mail!
S0091 (talk) 19:26, 20 January 2020 (UTC)