User talk:Lcxzdf56

January 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sudan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:10, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Sudan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Kleuske (talk) 13:48, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Kleuske (talk) 14:09, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. only (talk) 14:16, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Return to Wikipedia
I want active and, constructive participation in the Wikipedia community. Lcxzxf56 (talk) 12:07, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
 * As I posted above, you need to explain that you understand what you did and why it was wrong, how you won't do it again, and what constructive contributions you intend to make if unblocked. Just saying you want to participate is not enough. 331dot (talk) 12:13, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

I admit that I was wrong and, what I did was contrary to the Wikipedia policy. and to abide by it and I do not disagree but, at the time I was a new user I did not understand what the terms and conditions for good use. I intend in the future in constructive contribution that does not, conflict with the policy of Wikipedia.Lcxzxf56 (talk) 12:43, 18 June 2018 (UTC)