User talk:Ldcallahan1926

February 2013
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Brooks School does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Gtwfan52 (talk) 01:10, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. I notice that you removed topically-relevant content from Brooks School. However, Wikipedia is not censored to remove content that might be considered objectionable. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Gtwfan52 (talk) 01:17, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Your edits at Brooks
You keep removing referenced content from the article without explanation. It keeps getting put back. If you have a problem with the material, please go to the article's talk page and discuss it. Articles will frequently contain negative material about the subject of the article. As long as it is properly referenced, it can be there. The article is about the school; it doesn't belong to the school and the school has no more say than anyone else about what will be in it. Gtwfan52 (talk) 01:21, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors&#32; according to your reverts at Brooks School. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. ''The next step is to report you. You can either a) come to the article's talk page and discuss it (preferred course of action), b) cease your reversions, or c) face blocking. The choice is yours .'' Gtwfan52 (talk) 23:29, 7 February 2013 (UTC)