User talk:Ldemuth

Writing about the work of L Demuth III
Hello Ldemuth. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Innovation, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to you, your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.--McGeddon (talk) 16:46, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Your backwards-word neologism
Note WP:NEO: "To support an article about a particular term or concept we must cite what reliable secondary sources, such as books and papers, say about the term or concept, not books and papers that use the term." - it is not enough to point out that you invented a word in your own paper. --McGeddon (talk) 18:02, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

November 2011
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --Ronz (talk) 16:29, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Neologism, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 19:23, 22 November 2011 (UTC)