User talk:Le0Hallyu

Your submission at Articles for creation: KStarLive (June 1)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:KStarLive and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:49, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:KStarLive


A tag has been placed on Draft:KStarLive, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:50, 1 June 2017 (UTC) There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.


 * I have renamed your account from KStarLive. An uninvolved admin will assess your unblock request in due course. Just Chilling (talk) 15:19, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Promotionalism
Hello, the remaining concern is the promotional nature of your edits. The text of the deleted page reads as if you are trying to sell the reader on the subject. For instance-- "focuses" is a little too spammy. "dedicated to delivering " is right out of a corporate about page, well the rest of the sentence is too "hot", if you take my meaning. "strives"?-- nope. That the thing was wholly sourced from the corporate web page and an Alexa review don't help at all.

Encyclopedia subjects need to have lots written about them by lots of sources not connected with the subject. . If you can affirm understanding that this is the reason for you block-- the page read like an advertisement-- we can probably move forward with an unblock. It would help if you could find some other article to improve, name it here, and propose improvements to be made. This would help convince the community that you want to help build an encyclopedia rather than just write ads.

Almost forgot. Please read WP:Paid. If you receive any recompense for editing here, you need to disclose that. Thanks Dlohcierekim (talk) 00:45, 11 June 2017 (UTC)