User talk:Le nam nam le 1971

February 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The BJJ Video Show has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:10, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: The BJJ Video Show was changed by Le nam nam le 1971 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.958569 on 2016-02-19T16:10:53+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nathan Foley (singer). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  General Ization  Talk   16:15, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Unexplained moving of articles
Please don't move articles to new titles without explaining why. Checking sources for a number of the articles you have moved, I have found no support anywhere for any of the titles you have given them. Furthermore, the combination of those unexplained moves with other edits which have clearly been vandalism must cast doubt on all your editing, and continuation of such dubious editing may lead to being blocked from editing. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:19, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Need for sources
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. In view of the history of dubious editing from this account, this is particularly important in your case. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:49, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.
 * I have searched extensively for information regarding the content of the latest article you created, and it is perfectly clear that it was pure fiction. In addition, your other editing, particularly your page moves, have been unsupported by any sources, and you have never attempted to explain your reasons for making those changes, despite the messages you have received about the problems with your editing. Your editing is either 100% deliberate vandalism or else a significant amount of deliberate vandalism mixed with editing for which you have provided no justification, and which cannot be confirmed from searches. It is essential that you start providing references to reliable sources to justify your editing.
 * Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:31, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing, because of persistent disruptive editing. As I have already indicated above, some of your editing has been unambiguously vandalism, and the rest has consisted of making changes for which you have failed to provide sources, and my searches have also failed to provide any confirmation. Considering all the evidence, it seems probable that all of your editing has been vandalism, and if some of the edits weren't vandalism then you needed to provide supporting sources for those edits, but you ignored messages explaining the need for sources. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:17, 1 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Further investigation leads me to think this account may also have been used to evade blocks on other accounts. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:14, 1 March 2016 (UTC)