User talk:LeadSongDog/Archives/2011/June

The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011
To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:00, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Re: Your offer
I haven't had much time to look at it, but I've started automatically processing citations to get a list of articles used. I've had some (patchy) sucess so far. I can improve on that though! :) - Jarry1250 [Weasel? Discuss.] 12:40, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, finished. What do you think? - Jarry1250 [Weasel? Discuss.] 18:17, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, I can have a bot handle the adding, I just need to decide, for the difficult cases, where to put it. I'm thinking of doing a nice simple AWB-bot for the easy cases and semi-auto'ing the tricky ones depending on numbers. Can I get the OCLC/ISBN from WorldCat easily? Regards, - Jarry1250 [Weasel? Discuss.] 17:06, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * How about now? - Jarry1250 [Weasel? Discuss.] 12:53, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, forgot to mention: I've filed a BRFA for it. Regards, - Jarry1250 [Weasel? Discuss.] 17:06, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Civility
There was no insult from me in that edit summary, just a suggestion that you should make yourself familiar with the Wikipedia information on orginal research if you haven't already. I've responded to your most recent comments on the "Wild Mountain Thyme" talk page and suggested that you make use of at least one of those supporting sources you have to avoid further conflict with your fellow editors. As your user page states, you are someone who "recognizes the importance of citing sources"...so, cite some sources then. Kohoutek1138 (talk) 08:32, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Comment?
Would you mind revisiting NPWT, particularly my comments in this section? Thanks, WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/complex 14:26, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

No access to PPG
I don't have access to that publication. unless it is part of Pitt access (throw a link at me and I'll check). Try posting at talk of WikiProject Pittsburgh. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; talk 22:09, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I cannot access it from a Pitt computer. It is possible it is available through some obscure clunky database pitt library subscribes too, but frankly, I never needed to use them, so I am not sure how I'd try to find it through them. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; talk 17:41, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
 * This may give you more editors to contact, perhaps? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; talk 18:19, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

It looks like someone found "Livestock conservation" in the PPG. The Proquest archive has 1993-current issues. Feel free to ask again if you know of a need.  Will Beback   talk    11:40, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Yamaha DX-1 discussion
LeadSongDog I am already with familiar Verifiability, No original research, Identifying reliable sources and Civility. You said the images are not important, I am discussing the images in particular and they were removed without discussing them when there was already a discussion on the discussions page at the sametime. The image max is 500 x 400 but for an editor to remove it and say nothing on the discussions when it was asked to discuss removing or updating the article first. What if someone went on your user homepage LeadSongDog and they said that picture on your homepage is too big but it is within guidelines and they removed it, placed it somewhere else and they also removed another image also within guidelines, would you agree with someone doing that to your user talk homepage or would you be outraged (even if they didn't discuss it first)? The principle of the matter how it was done and disconcerned. I am not paid to edit on Wikipedia, its an article that needs fixing and has been abused without good merit. This discussion page is for discussing and I have used good judgement to use the discussions page to talk about the article first, when I made an edit on the artilce, I posted it on the discussions page first and I clarify it. The image issue has to be sorted out, I can deal with the updating the acedemic research on the article when I am ready.--Globalstatus (talk) 20:50, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * There's no point spewing the same bile here that you've already covered the article talkpage with. The fact remains that until verifiable, reliably sourced references are identified, the article has no place on Wikipedia at all. Solve that first, or there won't be a place for any picture. LeadSongDog come howl!  21:19, 29 June 2011 (UTC)