User talk:Leader6

Speedy deletion nomination of Affective leadership


A tag has been placed on Affective leadership, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Affective leadership and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Hairhorn (talk) 19:25, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Affective leadership
Hello. I wanted to ask what you believe I can do to include the article on Affective Leadership. It was only when someone who was working on his doctorate contacted me to ask me about the work that I thought about an article. He said the topic fit his dissertation proposal ideas, and he could not find additional information. I genuinely believe the model is an important one for leaders, and I am willing to make whatever changes you or others believe are necessary. Thank you very much for your time.
 * Hi. If you want to write an entry about a service or product, first it should make it clear that it is a product... ideally in the first sentence, rather than at the end of the first paragraph. Also, it should describe the product rather than selling it. The product should also be notable and the article based on reliable sources. The current article also synthesizes a lot of information in a way that's innapropriate for an encyclopedia entry. Okay, that's some advice. Cheers. Hairhorn (talk) 22:04, 15 September 2009 (UTC)