User talk:Learningcurvemediacic

6th November 2007
00:36

You have mis-read my e-mail. I said "I will quote from a newspaper article i read, written by William Lee, in the Crouch End & Hornsey Journal in May 2007 - in my next contribution"

I repeat "I WILL QUOTE FROM A PUBLISHED NEWSPAPER CALLED 'THE CROUCH END & HORNSEY JOURNAL" published in May 2007... I hope this is clear.

6th November 2007
Iridecent I see you have deleted two of my contributions. Having read the policy statement I understand one of them was not nuetral - but i dont know why you have chosen to remove my educational contribution. After all - Crouch End Community College of Arts & Design is registered by the UKRLP.

As a crouch-ender myself - im sure im not alone in the view that a link to the education list on the haringey council website is a bit short-thrift for the area's educational options. To avoid your deletions - I will quote from a newspaper article i read, written by William Lee, in the Crouch End & Hornsey Journal in May 2007 - in my next contribution. I am in the process of contacting him to clear some further editions to the article which I would like to have added - i will add these in the next day or so. No doubt you will relish in the prospect of a bonafide tertiary source to check up on (if you like i can supply you with William Lee's email address?). Meanwhile, perhaps you can be so kind as to let me know what objections you might have had to the old contribution so i know what to look out for - the things you clearly object to.

Also please confirm that the 'Crouch End & Hornsey Journal', which is published by Archant (one of the UKs biggest newspaper publishers) counts in your book as a tertairy source.

Many thanks for your wisdom and superior wiki knowledge

j


 * To save you doing the work if you don't have the sources email correspondence is not a reliable source. Please read this for more on sourcing; basically, if it hasn't appeared in print or on a legitimate website (BBC News, for example), it's not acceptable. As I've said earlier, Wikipedia exists only to cover material already covered elsewhere. I'd very strongly advise you to also read the notability guidelines to get a better feel for what's appropriate; read some current "Good Articles" and Featured Articles to get an idea of what sort of thing's acceptable as "encyclopedic content". —  iride  scent  20:28, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


 * As i said I will be quoting from a reliable printed newspaper source, i.e. Crouch End and Hornsey Journal - which i may add, will make all the other sources look rather flimsy. I notice that the other references given on this page include blogs on fairly obscure websites. Certainly nothing as known as the BBC.CO.uk. I can also see much that is not citated. Am I to understand that you yourself have chosen to use such references? Is there any regulation of this? With your permission I am going to raise this issue with the 1,000 facebook members that i affiliate with in the 'Crouch End Appreciation Society Group' - if you are not already a resident or member - perhaps you should join and give others the chance to have an opinion - as i personally think the entry is overall a bit tired and neglected. The source references are poor and almost any addition would be welcome.

November 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe our core policies. I appreciate you've put a lot of work into this, but Wikipedia is a tertiary source, and not the place for your own commentary on the area - that is, we can quote what newspapers say about things, but we can't give our own opinions. —  iride  scent  17:22, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Ceccad.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ceccad.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Acather96 (talk) 10:15, 14 May 2011 (UTC)