User talk:Leatherneck121

Welcome!

Hello, Leatherneck121, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV), and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

ICJ-related articles
Hi Leatherneck, I see you've made a number of contributions to articles related to the International Court of Justice. I agree these articles have room for improvement, and I assure you that you aren't alone in your distress that the ICJ let Serbia off. However, many of your edits directly and personally attack the subjects of the articles. This is generally stylistically inappropriate for an encyclopedia, so those edits have been reverted. If you can provide independent verification, please do so. Jeremy Tobacman 11:01, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Bjarki 19:50, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Leatherneck, it is your obligation to provide a clear source for material you add in the article you edit. You can't just say "Check the Internet" or "The other things were in various newspapers." - See WP:V You can't make your own conclusions from facts you find on the internet or elsewhere, as you appear to be doing about Owada. The link you left on my page is insufficient. This is called "Original Research" WP:NOR  You would need to find a source criticizing him or anyone else, and the criticism must be phrased in a neutral manner. See WP:NPOV. Wikipedia's WP:BLP policy is there for a simple reason.  If someone defames a living person and Wikipedia doesn't diligently  remove it, Wikipedia can be sued.  You really must learn about Wikipedia policy and how to edit before you do any more edits in the same style.  Otherwise there is little doubt that you will be treated as a vandal and blocked or banned, whether vandalism is your intent or not.John Z 11:01, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

FYI
I have found your concern about ICJ, I do wonder about a quotation, as I mentioned to John Z, see :. Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 11:45, 10 August 2010 (UTC)