User talk:Leawrnr

Welcome!
Hello, Leawrnr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Romaine (talk) 14:20, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
 * PS: The project page can be found at: Benelux Education Program/Maastricht University/FPN Historical Book Review Spring 2017. Romaine (talk) 14:20, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Feedback on your article
Hello Leawrnr, Thank you for writing your article in your sandbox! I have read the article and would like to give some feedback to improve your article to Wikipedia standards and customs. I especially will look if it meets the quality standards we have on Wikipedia. I standard look for a series of subjects that need improvement or are okay. I hope you can implement this feedback to your sandbox article before our next meeting. Thanks! Romaine (talk) 08:22, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Intro sentence: good!
 * Links: Please look for keywords in your article and link them to other Wikipedia articles. For example, you can link: "psychologists", "gender psychology", "psychological research", and more.
 * Headers: Parts of your article is still missing: the context of the book, the timeframe in what it was published, and how it was received.
 * References: Missing! Please go look out for sources that write about this book!
 * Context/timeframe: Missing!
 * How was the book received: Missing!
 * Other: Some questions that you need to answer in your article: where was the book published? who was the publisher? Are there other things to be told about the publication?
 * Hello Leawrnr, Thank you for improving your article! Last week we specifically asked to make sure you add sources/references to your article, because that is one of the most important parts of a Wikipedia article. We also wanted to make sure the intro sentence/section is ready. Let's see how it is going now.
 * Intro sentence: good!
 * Links: You made improvements, but more keywords can use a link.
 * Headers: I have not enough headers to be able to give feedback on, and as there is no content below the header of "Women in the 1920s" it is difficult to determine if this headers works well.
 * References: This is still insufficient. You really need to work hard on this to improve this.
 * Context/timeframe: As it is missing, I can't give feedback on this part...
 * How was the book received: As it is missing, I can't give feedback on this part...
 * It is not handy that still important parts are missing. Please do not wait too long! Romaine (talk) 00:47, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi Leawrnr, The image you had requested to be scanned has been kept (and not deleted) because it is too simple to be copyrighted. I just added it to your sandbox article. Romaine (talk) 02:06, 1 June 2017 (UTC)