User talk:Lebeau007

Citing your own blog as a source on Wikipedia
Hi there. I noticed that you've added what I assume is your own blog to a few pages. The problem is that there is no indication that this blog satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for a reliable source. In particular, we require editorial control and a history of fact-checking. Blogs, as self-published sources, are generally not acceptable, and almost never acceptable in a biography of a living person. If this is indeed your own blog, you should be aware that while we do allow contributors to cite themselves, there are tricky issues that involve conflicts of interest and promotion. Generally, it's easier (and better) to let other people cite your website, as it makes these issues (at least, the COI and promotion issues) a lot easier to resolve. When it comes to reliable sources, you can get community input at the reliable sources noticeboard, but it would help immensely if your site clearly indicated 1) if there is a professional editorial staff and 2) who those people are (real names preferred). I realize this must seem very bureaucratic, but it helps to keep Wikipedia verifiable. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:54, 15 May 2015 (UTC)