User talk:Lee Chi Lam

November 2018
Hello, I'm Peaceray. I noticed that you recently removed content from Eric Khoo without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Peaceray (talk) 16:16, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Eric Khoo, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 04:37, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Eric Khoo, you may be blocked from editing. Posting 3rd-level warning after 's reversion Peaceray (talk) 18:42, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Eric Khoo. GorillaWarfare (talk) 04:27, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Eric Khoo, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Peaceray (talk) 07:33, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
 * At this point, I think you need to discuss any changes that you want to make to Eric Khoo on the talk page, Talk:Eric Khoo. Your refusal do disclose in the edit summary your reasons for deleting the material have compromised your credibility. Peaceray (talk) 07:38, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Eric Khoo. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 17:34, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:56, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

When the block expires, stop edit-warring and start using the talk page to gain consensus for your changes. Otherwise you will be re-blocked and the duration will not expire. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:56, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Eric Khoo. No explanation for removing of content & no discussion on talk page despite repeated requests for both. Peaceray (talk) 07:02, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 10:22, 6 December 2018 (UTC)