User talk:Lee Vilenski/Archives/2022/November

Administrators' newsletter – November 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2022).

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Isabelle Belato · Whpq
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Atama · Astronautics~enwiki · Athaenara · Eddie891 · GraemeL · Marianocecowski · Natalya · Pratyeka · SB Johnny

Interface administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg TheresNoTime
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Ragesoss

CheckUser changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Blablubbs · Firefly
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Joe Roe

Oversight changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg DGG

Guideline and policy news
 * The article creation at scale RfC opened on 3 October and will be open until at least 2 November.
 * An RfC is open to discuss having open requests for adminship automatically placed on hold after the seven-day period has elapsed, pending closure or other action by a bureaucrat.

Arbitration
 * Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate themselves from 13 November 2022 until 22 November 2022 to stand in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections.
 * The arbitration case request titled Athaenara has been resolved by motion.
 * The arbitration case Reversal and reinstatement of Athaenara's block has entered the proposed decision stage.
 * , and  have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2022 Arbitration Committee Elections.  and  are reserve commissioners.

Miscellaneous
 * The 2022 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process has concluded with the appointment of two new CheckUsers.
 * You can add yourself to the centralised page listing time zones of administrators.
 * Tech tip: Wikimarkup in a block summary is parsed in the notice that the blockee sees. You can use templates with custom options to specify situations like or.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Marxism–Leninism&#32; on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 05:30, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender and Gender Diverse People&#32; on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 17:31, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2022 Hong Kong Masters
The article 2022 Hong Kong Masters you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2022 Hong Kong Masters for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Boca Jóvenes -- Boca Jóvenes (talk) 12:21, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2022 Hong Kong Masters
The article 2022 Hong Kong Masters you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2022 Hong Kong Masters for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Boca Jóvenes -- Boca Jóvenes (talk) 19:21, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2022 World Snooker Championship
The article 2022 World Snooker Championship you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2022 World Snooker Championship for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 02:01, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2022 World Snooker Championship
The article 2022 World Snooker Championship you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2022 World Snooker Championship for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 15:41, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Bharat Jodo Yatra&#32; on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 14:30, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fred Davis (snooker player)
The article Fred Davis (snooker player) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fred Davis (snooker player) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Boca Jóvenes -- Boca Jóvenes (talk) 22:21, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Question about COMMONNAME
Hello. Sorry to bother you. I want to hear your opinion about something, since you are an admin but also, understands how Pro wrestling works. Everytime a wrestler changes his name, the IPs and users wants to change the name of the article. As you saw, Paige/Saraya. Most of them argues WP:NAMECHANGES, since most reports uses the current name in reports. But this rule forgets the weight of the career. For example, Paige worked for years as Paige. Had a movie about her, appeared on Total Divas. So, a few weeks as Saraya doesn't equal her work as Paige. Same with Big Show. He works as commentator as Paul Wight, but her previous work as Big Show (20 years, world titles, main evented WrestleMania, some films) has more weight. My main complain is WP:NAMECHANGES "Sometimes the subject of an article will undergo a change of name". Sometimes, but in pro wrestling is quite often. In 10 years, Jon Huber had 5 names (Brodie Lee, Luke Harper, Harper, Luke Harper and Mr. Brodie Lee) for example. So, what do you think? HHH Pedrigree (talk) 19:15, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi! I think these guidelines are intentionally obtuse. My view is that we should have an article at a name which is most likely to be understood by the most people. COMMONNAME suggests we should have articles at the most commonly used name, but there is some nuance. The way I interpret it is that NAMECHANGES means we should give more weight to new names, but we shouldn't just change the name of things because the subject has. I still think Luke Harper is the most recognisable name in the list you gave me. Sometimes using new names is done with the idea that the subject will be more recognisable by that name over time. However, in this case it isn't true (as they died). There is an argument that someone who changes their name a lot should actually just be on their actual name, which I wouldn't be against either.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 18:26, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, I think it's a case-per-case situation. For example, Nikki Cross/ASH. She wrestled for years as Cross. Then, she changed to ASH and people suddenly wanted to change the name, despite her previous career as Cross. As ASH, she won the Money in the bank, The Women's Tag Ttitle, the Women's World title, so she has a lot of exposure. Back to Nikki Cross and people want to change the name again based on "she has a previous carrer as Cross", then, the article shoulnd't be changed in first place. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 15:13, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 FIFA World Cup Group B, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Red card.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:AFL&#32; on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 12:30, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Charles Faroux
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Charles Faroux you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of An anonymous username, not my real name -- An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 17:01, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Charles Faroux
The article Charles Faroux you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Charles Faroux for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of An anonymous username, not my real name -- An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 17:21, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Language and linguistics request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Czech koruna&#32; on a "Language and linguistics" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 20:30, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

GA Reassessment
Honolulu (pool) has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. 141Pr 08:45, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 November newsletter
The 2022 WikiCup has drawn to a close with the final round going down to the wire. The 2022 champion is
 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Lee Vilenski (1752 points), who won in 2020 and was runner up in both 2019 and last year. In the final round he achieved 3 FAs and 15 GAs, mostly on cue sports. He was closely followed by
 * Bloom6132 (1732), who specialised in "In the news" items and DYKs, and who has reached the final round of the Cup for the past three years. Next was
 * ICS Zulu.svg BennyOnTheLoose (1238), another cue sports enthusiast, also interested in songs, followed by
 * Muboshgu (1082), an "In the news" contributor, a seasoned contestant who first took part in the Cup ten years ago. Other finalists were
 * Transgender Pride flag.svg Sammi Brie (930), who scored with a featured article, good articles and DYKs on TV and radio stations,
 * 🇺🇳 Kavyansh.Singh (370), who created various articles on famous Americans, including an FA on Louis H. Bean, famed for his prediction of election outcomes. Next was
 * PCN02WPS (292), who scored with good articles and DYKs on sporting and other topics and
 * Z1720 (25) who had DYKs on various topics including historic Canadians.

During the WikiCup, contestants achieved 37 featured articles, 349 good articles, 360 featured article reviews, 683 good article reviews and 480 In the news items, so Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors. Well done everyone! All those who reached the final round will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or the overall leader in this field.


 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Lee Vilenski wins the featured article prize, for a total of 6 FAs during the course of the competition and 3 in the final round.
 * 🇺🇳 Kavyansh.Singh wins the featured list prize, for 3 FLs in round 2.
 * Pirate Flag of Jack Rackham.svg Adam Cuerden wins the featured picture prize, for 39 FPs during the competition.
 * Z1720 wins the featured article reviewer prize, for 35 FARs in round 4.
 * Epicgenius wins the good article prize, for 32 GAs in round 1.
 * Flag of Provo, Utah (1989–2015).svg SounderBruce wins the featured topic prize, for 4 FT articles in round 1.
 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Lee Vilenski wins the good topic prize, for 34 GT articles in round 5.
 * Transgender Pride flag.svg Sammi Brie wins the good article reviewer prize, for 71 GARs overall.
 * Transgender Pride flag.svg Sammi Brie wins the Did you know prize, for 30 DYKs in round 3 and 106 overall.
 * Bloom6132 wins the In the news prize, for 106 ITNs in round 5 and 289 overall.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January and possible changes to the rules and scoring are being discussed on the discussion page. You are invited to sign up to take part in the contest; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to have a good turnout for the 2023 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners and finalists, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Retribution (professional wrestling)
The article Retribution (professional wrestling) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Retribution (professional wrestling) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Trainsandotherthings -- Trainsandotherthings (talk) 14:02, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Cup win
Well done mate, top notch! Hope to back competing with you at some point! The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 19:33, 6 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Congratulations! I look forward to attempting to dethrone you next year :) Hope your weekend was rewarding and you've got fun things cue 'd up in the near future, both irl and on-wiki. — Ixtal ( T / C ) &#8258; Non nobis solum. 19:46, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks guys. I didn't think I'd be able to make it happen. I have some more projects on the way for next year!  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:52, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Congratulations! I didn't have the time to make a serious attempt at the Cup this year, but it seems you're always there or there abouts, and the project is all the better for it... &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 11:39, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Wikipedia talk:Inline citation&#32; on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 21:30, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup awards


Congratulations on putting in a tremendous performance in the final round and winning the Cup! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:47, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Jair Bolsonaro&#32; on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 08:30, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Mary, Queen of Scots/RFC on Number&#32; on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 05:30, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Economy, trade, and companies request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Acquisition of Twitter by Elon Musk&#32; on a "Economy, trade, and companies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 23:30, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Articles
Hello Lee. I looked at QSports articles. Many have been completed by you. Thank you for them. If possible, I would like you to make some more articles. thank you in advance.

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asian_Confederation_of_Billiard_Sports = Asian Confederation of Billiard Sports

ACBS Asian Six Reds Snooker Championship = by sources

1- 2012

2- 2013 - Doha - Qatar

3- 2014 - Karachi - Pakistan 3rd Snooker 6-Red and 2nd Snooker Team Championships

4- 2015 - Kish Island - Iran

5- 2016 - Abu Dhabi - UAE

6- 2017 - Bishkek - Kyrgyzstan

7- 2018 - Doha - Qatar

8- 2019 - Doha - Qatar

thank you so much.Lewoma (talk) 09:52, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi! I do indeed write articles for cue sports. I must admit, I have looked at a few of these previously, but struggled to find third party sourcing for them. The ACBS should absolutely have an article, so I will get to that when I have time. Otherwise, the six-red continental championship might be difficult to sell without some newspaper sources or similar, but might be notable.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 13:02, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

WPA World Pyramid Pool Championship

Hi. thanks. What about Russian billiards tournaments?

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freie-Pyramide-Weltmeisterschaft - Free Pyramid World Championship

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamische-Pyramide-Weltmeisterschaft - Dynamic Pyramid World Championship

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kombinierte-Pyramide-Weltmeisterschaft - Combined Pyramid World Championship

Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Wikipedia talk:Administrators&#32; on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 22:30, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Ai: The Somnium Files Question
Hey there!

When I nominated the article for GA status, I did it with an intent to gather feedback for what to fix and what to improve on with getting the article to GA status, but based on your response, I assume that there is a different way for doing that before nominating? If there is, could you tell me what that way would be?

I'm in the middle of the transition of being a newbie and being covered by WP:GF, to trying to expand outwards to more things I like doing and things that I am passionate about, while coming out of that initial new person phase, so it's been a bit of a rough ride for me the last few days, so apologies in advance for mistakes that I have/going to make. Trust me, I am trying my best and trying to review guidelines that I need to follow when making decisions. Best, Zekerocks11 (talk) 17:45, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi! You are of course free to renominate the article, but I removed the tag as if I had reviewed it, I would have failed it immediately. The reception section doesn't really cover all it should, and there are both grammatical and MOS errors in the prose.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:40, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Skyrush GA review
In case you missed the ping, I have brought up issues with your GA review of Skyrush at Template:Did you know nominations/Skyrush. While these problems are in the process of being resolved (and may actually be resolved by the time you see this message), they are concerning nonetheless. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:59, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm confused. These seem significantly outside of the bounds of a DYK review - and if you think the GA review was poor, WP:GAR is the location. Most of the issues seem fair, such as not sourcing items as they only appear in the lede - but we shouldn't be sourcing that an item DIDN'T win an award.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 07:17, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Epicgenius has sourced that it didn't win an award, which was the proper thing to do. DYK criterion 4 states: "Within policy – Articles for DYK must conform to the core policies of Verifiability". It was my responsibility to make sure that the article followed that. I'm taking up this issue of your GA review here instead of GAR because:
 * Alternative #3 to GAR is notifying major contributors and GAR should be a last resort, not a first resort
 * GAR would only deal with the surface-level issue of an article not meeting the GA criteria – it does not deal with the fundamental issue of a user's reviews
 * Evidently something has gone wrong when a DYK review is far more thorough than a GA review, and it's better to discuss that with the reviewer so that it does not occur again
 * Frankly, your response has worried me further. The crux of the issues with that article was that there seemed to be no/few checks being made that the material was being supported by the sources cited – it wasn't a simple case of "not sourcing items as they only appear in the lede". Given that the review seemed to concentrate on prose issues, I can't believe that this has to be said, but do you make verifiability checks for GA reviews? And did you do so in this instance? Sdrqaz (talk) 18:14, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi. I'm still a bit bemused why we would require someone to source something that didn't happen. I do indeed do spot checks during a GA review, but generally only mention them when something pops up, same as I do for copyright. It's worth noting that checking every source to see if it completely covers what the text says is not part of the GA (or FA for that matter) criteria. I am glad you have found additional things that can and have been addressed.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 18:44, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Personally, I think that the previous formulation ("in every year except 2016 and 2020, Skyrush has been ranked") is subtly different to saying something like or  because the ones in red don't say what happened in 2016 and 2020 but the green one does (or at least certainly implies it). A roughly analogous example may be a child saying that they're friends with everyone in their class except x, compared to them listing their friends. Regardless, as far as concerns for that article went, that was a minor one that I was willing to let go if Epicgenius disagreed with me. I'm aware that the prevailing practice at FAC is to do spot-checks only, but if a non-insignificant volume is getting through, then perhaps at the very least  of them should be done. Sdrqaz (talk) 12:58, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

World Straight Pool Championship
I posted a topic at the project talk page days ago. Please give me your thoughts on it. 104.172.112.209 (talk) 17:59, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
 * As much as I enjoy watching a bit of straight pool - I don't know anything about this event.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:01, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Colorado Springs nightclub shooting&#32; on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 10:31, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Kryvyi Rih&#32; on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 18:30, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Royalty and Nobility&#32; on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 21:31, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Kryvyi Rih&#32; on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 22:30, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

TFA
Thank you today for 2022 Welsh Open (snooker), introduced: "It may surprise you to learn that I don't get to see a lot of professional snooker live. This was the second event I managed to get to in the last five years. A superb week in a great venue - with some images taken during the event in the article. The Welsh Open is often a good but minor event, but for two years straight has had a great narrative. The previous year's winner Jordan Brown won his first event, ranked 80th in the world. This year, perennial journeyman Joe Perry won the event, defeating the majorly in-form Ricky Walden in the quarter-finals, Jack Lisowski (who had won a match of the season contender against Ali Carter in the round prior), a serial winner Judd Trump in the final to win his second ranking event, the first being a minor 2015 Players Tour Championship Grand Final win. Perry's win was at age 47, the second oldest winner of a ranking event (at the time). A great event"! - Congratulations also to the Wikicup successes! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:26, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh, hi, I didn't actually know this was at TFA. News to me! Thanks for the support.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 16:30, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Interesting, - I don't think I was ever surprised on TFA day ;) - Thanksgiving in the U.S. - Bach said it in music for peace --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:18, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

edit to World Cup lede
thank you for that edit to the World Cup lede. 'scheduled to be' sounds perfect. Godofwarfan333 (talk) 12:01, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative algorithms for providing personalized task recommendations through SuggestBot. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:30, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

lad
why do you keep making pointless deletions. like what exactly is your rationale behind deleting a mention of an assist? or the fact it was the second game? please explain. i don't wish to argue, but it does often feel like your edits of the information i've added are more driven by spite than anything else, as you never ever edit things to be better but altogether remove it. Godofwarfan333 (talk) 12:22, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Don't call me a "lad". You keep introducing items that have either undue WP:WEIGHT, editorialising (such as stating how many people were looking forward to a match), and often adding NPOV things. That combined with the mass amounts of copyright infringement in photographs, a WP:BATTLEGROUND mentality and no WP:CIVILITY doesnt look good on you.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:29, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
 * huh? really? that was your first point of contention here? smh why do I bother...
 * stating that Argentina needed to avoid defeat wasn't NPOV or editorialising. it was an objective fact, yet you removed it. furthermore, you constantly keep reverting my edits, and have broken 3RRR. what even Godofwarfan333 (talk) 12:36, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Deleting sourced content with multiple reliable references on purpose and then leaving pointless comments in the edit summary, as you just did on the article, is another proof of your lack of competence. GenoV84 (talk) 12:49, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Deleting sourced content with multiple reliable references on purpose and then leaving pointless comments in the edit summary, as you just did on the article, is proof of your lack of competence lmao. if you were even a bit self-aware you'd realise you've been doing exactly what you accuse me of doing. Godofwarfan333 (talk) 14:29, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
 * You can play the victim as much as you want; many established editors have already reverted your disruptive edits several times, for the same reason. Everyone can see that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. GenoV84 (talk) 14:47, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
 * WP:Appeal to authority
 * stop beating a dead horse and do yourself a favour Godofwarfan333 (talk) 14:48, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 November 2022
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:41, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky&#32; on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 05:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)