User talk:Lee got bit

Welcome!
Hello, Lee got bit, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! GABgab 09:39, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

An extended welcome
Hi Lee got bit. Welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Ronz (talk) 16:38, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Please be far more careful with the sources you choose
Hello, I'm Ronz. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! --Ronz (talk) 23:46, 1 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Hello Ronz, I didn't make any changes to the text of the articles, I just tried to add missing sources! For all of them I have checked whether the websites have already been used as sources in other articles. This applies to all of them.--Lee got bit (talk) 08:11, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Sorry about the notice, which doesn't completely describe the situation, as you're simply adding references.
 * You're fairly frequently using poor and unreliable sources. One of the problems is you're finding sources that use Wikipedia as references, which is inappropriate per WP:CIRCULAR.
 * Please be more careful. --Ronz (talk) 15:45, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Thank you for your work

RedThatCat (talk) 19:05, 29 August 2019 (UTC) 

Circular sourcing
Hi Lee, I've noticed a few examples where you added self-published sources that had been copied from the article you were working on. In the cases I've looked at, the website states that its source is Wikipedia. This is known as circular sourcing; see WP:CIRCULAR and this xkcd. Please go back through the sources you've added and remove any examples of that kind of source. In addition, it's usually wise (for this and other reasons) to avoid self-published sources, and they should never be used to support text about living people; see WP:BLPSPS. Many thanks, SarahSV (talk) 15:06, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Please don't use NNDB
It was deprecated in a 2019 RfC. Editors note NNDB's poor reputation for fact-checking and accuracy, despite the site claiming to have an editorial process. Editors have also found instances of NNDB incorporating content from Wikipedia, which would make the use of the affected pages circular sourcing. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 16:39, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I found another citation.--Lee got bit (talk) 16:49, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

IMDb
Hello! I saw your recent on Pam St Clement's article and thought I'd inform you that using IMDb as a source is prohibited per WP:CITEIMDB, since it's a user-edited source like Wikipedia itself. – DarkGlow (talk) 09:57, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

December 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Jason Collins, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Specifically per MOS:LEADCITE, citations are generally not needed in the lead if supported already in the body. —Bagumba (talk) 13:33, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Please try to leave more edit summaries
Hello. I have noticed that you edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! 13:09, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)