User talk:Leeconn

Image source problem with Image:Dale 03.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Dale 03.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:25, 16 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Geni 00:25, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

I have removed the image. Leeconn (talk) 03:45, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Dale Connelly
I noticed that you removed some biographical data regarding Dale such as date of birth, high school and college that you had originally posted. Do you have any objection to my adding that back to Dale's wiki page? BuffaloBob (talk) 21:02, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Yes I do object. Leeconn (talk) 03:44, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for the reply. Would you care to explain why? If it is factual and not negative or controversial it should be included in a biography. BuffaloBob (talk) 13:31, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

It is personal information. I was wrong to post it in the first place. If it is to appear in the article, Dale may add it himself. Otherwise, YOU MAY NOT RE-POST IT.Leeconn (talk) 03:09, 24 May 2009 (UTC)