User talk:Leejs89

Talkback

 * Leejs89, I can be your mentor, please take a look at my talkpage for your comments. Did you have an article in mind yet? Sadads (talk) 21:53, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

New article choice
I fixed the references problem, you just needed to add the template reflist to the bottom of the page in order to display the footnotes. However, I do have a little concern over your article choice. I am unsure what level of references are available to to significantly expand the article without very expansive and hard research, even though it is in sore need of references. Remember, you should be using mostly secondary sources for adding the references. Do you have sources in mind that would really help the article? Also, remember to add more citation information to the references you add, including title, author, access date, etc. Sadads (talk) 20:15, 22 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Okay, so I just realized the website I was getting information from was for the Clinton Presidential Center instead of the Clinton School of Public Service. I've gone ahead and taken down the information I had typed. I now understand what you're saying about lack of sources or references. I may need to change my topic again. Leejs89 (talk) 19:45, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
 * If you have any concerns or want help finding an article, or a topic, feel free to ask me, but explore articles and Wikipedia. This list may be useful. For example, I think Elementary and Secondary Education Act would be really good, see all the scholarship on Google Scholar, Sadads (talk) 20:22, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I looked up the Elementary and Secondary Education Act and I found A LOT more information than my previous topic. So I think I'll switch. Thanks for the suggestion! Leejs89 (talk) 17:59, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi janna, I just noticed that you are listed on the course page table twice. Can you remove one of those entries? I am not sure which is correct. Thanks! Cindy Allen (talk) 19:45, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I can't see where I'm on the table twice - I only see my name at the bottom. But I'll change it if I find the second name! Also, I'd like to talk to you during class tomorrow about my topic. See you in class! Thank you, Leejs89 (talk) 01:59, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Checking in on you
Hello, have you begun reading for additional information which you can add to the articles? Do you need any help with anything? Sadads (talk) 01:14, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Hey! Yes, I've been collecting information on my new topic and looking up articles that I can use. I haven't put much up yet, but I will begin soon. Thanks for checking in! I'll let you know if I have any questions. Thanks! Leejs89 (talk) 15:12, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Good place to start with these edits. I would suggest that you explore more Secondary sources from scholars as you do the research and make sure that you use a full citation in your references, with author's name, publication date, title, etc. Sadads (talk) 20:45, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:US Department of Education.gif
Thank you for uploading File:US Department of Education.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 04:14, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Recent edits
Good job on these edits! It's a good place to start. Now I think we need to move away from using the WP:Primary sources and move forward with finding critical opinions of the act and summarizing their opinions about the act from various academics. Remember Wikipedia articles are not only a summary of the objects themselves, but also the entire scholarly opinion of topic. A good example of this would be the Roe v. Wade article which spends considerable time talking about the context in which the court case took place, as well as the repercussions, Sadads (talk) 09:00, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 16:40, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 01:30, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

GOCE newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 10:55, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

GOCE 2011 Year-End Report
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:29, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

File:US Department of Education.gif listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:US Department of Education.gif, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sumanch (talk) 11:30, 5 February 2012 (UTC)