User talk:Leeltermias/be bold

Article Evaluation
The wikipedia article regarding the Civil Rights act of 1964 was very informative in nature and lacked minuscule details regarding the matter. The article depicts several elements of quality articles such as the presence of an understandable lead section, and clear structure with detailed subheadings for each subtopic of the article. An additional notable element of quality regards the neutrality of the article. The author very concisely stated the positions of politicians on the Act and did not go on to to provide reasons as to why one particular political stance was any better or worse than another. Additionally, the article is balanced well in that neutral language is used is used to aid the articles aim to inform the public. No favor is given to either political side and no particular article is referenced too heavily. The entire article is relevant to its title. As for improvements to be made, the cited sources within the article all are linked to other wikipedia sources, which isn't very diverse. Seeing as wikipedia articles are formed by referencing an array of sources, it can be assumed that the sources are neutral. The comments within the talk page discussed questionable facts regarding politics during the time, and criticism formatting of sections. Leeltermias (talk) 03:22, 28 January 2019 (UTC)